JVC FWX1 [3.7/10]
Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for JVC FWX1
IEMRanking.com
Home
JVC FWX1
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
3.7Poor
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3.5Gaming Grade
D+JVC FWX1 Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: Warm V
Price (Msrp): $450
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
4*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Precogvision
3.3
Reviewer Score
D
Tuning
C-
Tech
Oh, how the FDX1 has fallen. Bloated bass and the treble sounds all sorts of wrong.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C-
Mids: D
Treble: E+
Dynamics: C-
Details: C-
Imaging: C-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
JVC FWX1 Infos
Compare JVC FWX1 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
JVC FWX1 vs. Yu9 Que
Yu9 Que offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
8.2 |
|
JVC FWX1 vs. NiceHCK Rockies
NiceHCK Rockies offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
8.1 |
|
JVC FWX1 vs. Xenns Top Pro
Xenns Top Pro offers better treble, mids and details.
|
7.9 |
|
JVC FWX1 vs. ZiiGaat Luna
ZiiGaat Luna offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
7.9 |
|
JVC FWX1 vs. Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk
Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk offers better treble, mids and details.
|
7.7 |
|
JVC FWX1 vs. HiSenior Cano Cristales
HiSenior Cano Cristales offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
7.5 |
|
JVC FWX1 vs. Ziigaat Arcanis
Ziigaat Arcanis offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.5 |
|
JVC FWX1 vs. Yanyin Canon II
Similar overall performance.
|
7.5 |
|
JVC FWX1 vs. Kiwi Ears x HBB Punch
Kiwi Ears x HBB Punch offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
7.4 |
|
JVC FWX1 vs. Softears Studio 4
Softears Studio 4 offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
7.4 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
D- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C-- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids
D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble
E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics
C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Details
C-
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging
C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming
D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review