JVC FWX1 - Reviews & Ratings

2 Reviews (D Tier | 3.7/10)

Home JVC FWX1

Summary

Based on 2 reviews, the JVC FWX1 is landing below average in reviewer sentiment, with few reports of standout moments.

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

3.7

Poor

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.5

Gaming Grade

D+

JVC FWX1 Details

Driver Configuration: 1DD

Tuning Type: Warm, V-Shaped

Top Warm IEMs Top V-Shaped IEMs

Price (Msrp): $450

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 4* * score rescaled + normalized
check links for more info:

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
YouTube video thumbnail

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3.3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
C- Tech
Oh, how the FDX1 has fallen. Bloated bass and the treble sounds all sorts of wrong.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: D Treble: E+ Dynamics: C- Details: C- Imaging: C-

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

JVC FWX1 Infos

Discuss JVC FWX1 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "JVC FWX1 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare JVC FWX1 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough JVC FWX1 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
JVC FWX1 vs. Yu9 Que
Yu9 Que offers better treble, mids and bass.
Show Yu9 Que
 8.1
JVC FWX1 vs. Hercules Audio Noah
Hercules Audio Noah offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
Show Hercules Audio Noah
 8.1
JVC FWX1 vs. Nicehck Rockies
Nicehck Rockies offers better treble, mids and bass.
Show Nicehck Rockies
 8
JVC FWX1 vs. Xenns Top Pro
Xenns Top Pro offers better treble, mids and details.
Show Xenns Top Pro
 7.9
JVC FWX1 vs. ZiiGaat Luna
ZiiGaat Luna offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
Show ZiiGaat Luna
 7.9
JVC FWX1 vs. MYER-AUDIO SLIIVO SLT6
MYER-AUDIO SLIIVO SLT6 offers better treble, imaging and details.
Show MYER-AUDIO SLIIVO SLT6
 7.8
JVC FWX1 vs. Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk
Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk offers better treble, mids and details.
Show Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk
 7.7
JVC FWX1 vs. Kiwi Ears x HBB Punch
Kiwi Ears x HBB Punch offers better treble, bass and mids.
Show Kiwi Ears x HBB Punch
 7.7
JVC FWX1 vs. Yanyin Canon Pro
Yanyin Canon Pro offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
Show Yanyin Canon Pro
 7.5
JVC FWX1 vs. HiSenior Cano Cristales
HiSenior Cano Cristales offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
Show HiSenior Cano Cristales
 7.5
Best IEMs from $400 - $600

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Bass C-
Low-end presence is gentle and restrained, favoring balance over slam. There's enough presence for casual listening.
Mids D
Mid frequencies swing wildly, colouring vocals and instruments unpredictably. Instruments trade places unpredictably.
Treble E+
Treble feels muted, reducing brilliance and sheen across tracks. Recordings lack their usual energy.
Dynamics C-
Volume swings are adequate, though they rarely feel dramatic. It won't offend, yet it won't thrill.
Details C-
Nothing sounds offensive, yet nothing is etched sharply enough to captivate detail lovers. It's fine for casual listening sessions.
Imaging C-
You can tell where things generally sit, though exact locations feel blurred. Center vocals sit mostly where expected.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer