KBEAR 03 - Reviews & Ratings
3 Reviews (C Tier | 4.6/10)
Summary
Based on 3 reviews, the KBEAR 03 is a situational pick according to reviewers, who suggest matching it carefully to individual tastes.
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.6Generally Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.8Gaming Grade
CKBEAR 03 Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+1BA+1BC
Tuning Type: V-Shaped
Brand: Kbear Top Kbear IEMs
Price (Msrp): $69
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Paul Wasabii
4.8
* Score computed by IEMRanking.com
Youtube Video Summary
KBEAR KB03 takes the KB02 recipe — dynamic driver plus bone conduction — and bolts on a budget balanced armature. The result is not an upgrade. The added BA pushes more upper treble while the altered bone conduction response becomes far more noticeable, bringing artifacts that skew tonality and pull the presentation away from natural. The playful, easygoing character that made KB02 popular is largely gone.
On tracks that hit both the BA’s top end and the BC region, the mix turns weird: cymbals take on a plasticky edge, midrange coherency wavers, and the overall tuning feels less enjoyable. At $69 (vs $39.99 for KB02), the value proposition slips; this crosses from ‘try it for fun’ into ‘it must sound right,’ and it does not. Those simply curious about BC experiments may still find it interesting, but expectations should be tempered.
Paul Wasabii Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
3.3
Reviewer Score
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Web Search
5.7
Reviewer Score
The KBEAR KB03 (Alkaid) is a budget tri-hybrid IEM using 1DD + 1BA + 1 bone-conduction driver, positioned around $55–69 depending on retailer; this configuration is unusual at the price and defines its core proposition . Tonally, available measurements and listening reports describe a mild V-shaped balance: elevated bass/treble with a modestly set-back midrange, aiming for broad appeal without sharp peaks . In practice this yields punchy low end and a clean, slightly lively top, while male vocals can sit a touch behind dense mixes—consistent with the tuning profile .
Technical performance is competitive for the bracket: imaging is orderly and separation is adequate, while the soundstage skews average in width and depth for an in-ear at this price (neither claustrophobic nor expansive) . It is also easy to drive—published figures around low impedance and moderate sensitivity translate to confident output from phones and dongles, with dynamics that are decent but not class-leading . Overall, the KB03 offers a value-centric package with a safe, energetic tilt and solid everyday technicalities, provided one accepts a conventional stage size and the V-shaped midrange set-back .
KBEAR 03 Infos
Discuss KBEAR 03 with the community
Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "KBEAR 03 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.
Compare KBEAR 03 to popular alternatives
VS
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
KBEAR 03 vs. Artti T10
Similar overall performance.
|
7 |
|
KBEAR 03 vs. KZ Zenith
KZ Zenith offers better dynamics, mids and soundstage.
|
6.8 |
|
KBEAR 03 vs. KZ AM16
KZ AM16 offers better dynamics, soundstage and mids.
|
6.8 |
|
KBEAR 03 vs. Sivga M300
Sivga M300 offers better soundstage, dynamics and mids.
|
6.6 |
|
KBEAR 03 vs. SIMGOT EG280
SIMGOT EG280 offers better soundstage, dynamics and mids.
|
6.6 |
|
KBEAR 03 vs. Rose Technics Star City 5 Pro
Rose Technics Star City 5 Pro offers better dynamics and soundstage.
|
6.5 |
|
KBEAR 03 vs. Moondrop May
Moondrop May offers better soundstage, mids and dynamics.
|
6.5 |
|
KBEAR 03 vs. EarAcoustic STA Pro Max
EarAcoustic STA Pro Max offers better dynamics, soundstage and mids.
|
6.5 |
|
KBEAR 03 vs. Simgot EW300
Similar overall performance.
|
6.5 |
|
KBEAR 03 vs. ROSESELSA QuietSea II
ROSESELSA QuietSea II offers better dynamics, soundstage and mids.
|
6.5 |
IEM Finder Quiz
newAverage Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Expect a patchy tonal profile that makes instrumentation feel mismatched. EQ is almost mandatory to tame the response.
Average Technical Grade
C- Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.
User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review