Kinera iDun 2.0 - Reviews & Ratings
1 Review (D Tier | 3.5/10)
IEMRanking.com
Home
Kinera iDun 2.0
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
3.5Poor
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3.8Gaming Grade
D+Kinera iDun 2.0 Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+2BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: Kinera Top Kinera IEMs
Price (Msrp): $230
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Precogvision
3.5
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
D+
Tech
Poor, wonky tonality. Vocals sound uncanny.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C-
Mids: C-
Treble: C-
Dynamics: D
Details: C-
Imaging: C-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Kinera iDun 2.0 Infos
Compare Kinera iDun 2.0 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
|
7.7 |
|
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, dynamics and bass.
|
7.6 |
|
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, bass and details.
|
7.6 |
|
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.4 |
|
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. Crinear Meta
Crinear Meta offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.3 |
|
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better dynamics, bass and imaging.
|
7.3 |
|
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Kiwi Ears Septet offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.3 |
|
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. FatFreq x HBB Deuce
FatFreq x HBB Deuce offers better bass, mids and dynamics.
|
7.2 |
|
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey 2
Ziigaat Odyssey 2 offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
|
7.1 |
|
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews
ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews offers better dynamics and mids.
|
7.1 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C-- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
D+- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids
C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble
C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics
D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details
C-
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging
C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming
D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review