Kinera iDun 2.0 - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (D Tier | 3.5/10)

Home Kinera iDun 2.0

Summary

Based on 1 review, the Kinera iDun 2.0 is getting lukewarm responses from reviewers, who note that it performs best with tempered expectations.

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision

Average Reviewer Score:

3.5

Poor

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.8

Gaming Grade

D+

Kinera iDun 2.0 Details

Driver Configuration: 1DD+2BA

Tuning Type: n/a

Brand: Kinera Top Kinera IEMs

Price (Msrp): $230

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3.5 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
D+ Tech
Poor, wonky tonality. Vocals sound uncanny.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: C- Treble: C- Dynamics: D Details: C- Imaging: C-

Kinera iDun 2.0 Infos

Discuss Kinera iDun 2.0 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Kinera iDun 2.0 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Kinera iDun 2.0 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Kinera iDun 2.0 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
Show Aful Performer 5+2
 7.7
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better dynamics, mids and bass.
Show Ziigaat Odyssey
 7.7
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. Simgot ET142
Simgot ET142 offers better mids, treble and details.
Show Simgot ET142
 7.5
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better dynamics, bass and details.
Show MYER SL224
 7.5
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, bass and details.
Show Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
 7.5
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews
ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews offers better dynamics and mids.
Show ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews
 7.4
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. Crinear Meta
Crinear Meta offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
Show Crinear Meta
 7.4
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
Show Binary Dynaquattro
 7.4
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. Letshuoer Cadenza 4
Letshuoer Cadenza 4 offers better mids, details and imaging.
Show Letshuoer Cadenza 4
 7.3
Kinera iDun 2.0 vs. 7Hz Timeless 2
7Hz Timeless 2 offers better details, bass and imaging.
Show 7Hz Timeless 2
 7.3
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • It struggles with balance, producing a lumpy response that rarely sounds coherent. Genre hopping highlights glaring inconsistencies.

Average Technical Grade

D+
  • Resolution is limited, masking finer nuances and narrowing the soundstage. Busy mixes still overwhelm it with ease.
Bass C-
Bass stays subdued, content to hover in the background. It keeps things tidy, yet unremarkable.
Mids C-
The region is listenable but lacks the finesse and clarity of better tuning. A touch of EQ can smooth things out.
Treble C-
Highs are present enough yet carry a bit of grain and splash. Busy mixes can still feel a bit splashy.
Dynamics D
Expect a limited dynamic swing that keeps musical climaxes from hitting hard. Volume gradations feel artificially restrained.
Details C-
You get the outline of textures, though the finer brushstrokes remain faint. Background information is audible but soft.
Imaging C-
Depth hints are present though they rarely extend far beyond the stage front. Movement effects are understandable.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer