Kiwi Ears Quartet [4.8/10]
Reviews (7), scores and comparisons for Kiwi Ears Quartet
IEMRanking.com
Home
Kiwi Ears Quartet
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.8Generally Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.1Gaming Grade
C-Kiwi Ears Quartet Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD+2BA
Tuning Type: Bassy V
Brand: Kiwi Ears Top Kiwi Ears IEMs
Price (Msrp): $110
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Z-Reviews
7.2
* score normalized
Reviewed by:
Fresh Reviews
5.5*
* The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
5.3
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C+
Tech
check links for more info:
Bass: B
Mids: B-
Treble: C-
Soundstage: B-
Details: C+
Imaging: B-
Reviewed by: Jays Audio
5
Reviewer Score
B+
Tuning
B
Tech
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
4.3
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
E-
Tech
Silly fun V shaped set, but very not neutral.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+
Treble: E-
Dynamics: C-
Soundstage: B
Reviewed by: Super* Review
4*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Nymz
3
Reviewer Score
D
Tuning
D
Tech
Overly extended bass that bleeds into the mid-range (very warm).
Bass: D
Mids: D
Treble: D
Details: D
Imaging: D
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Kiwi Ears Quartet Infos
Compare Kiwi Ears Quartet to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Kiwi Ears Quartet vs. Aful Explorer
Aful Explorer offers better treble, dynamics and details.
|
7.1 |
|
Kiwi Ears Quartet vs. Tanchjim Fission
Tanchjim Fission offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
|
7 |
|
Kiwi Ears Quartet vs. Dunu Kima 2
Dunu Kima 2 offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
|
7 |
|
Kiwi Ears Quartet vs. Kiwi Ears Airoso
Kiwi Ears Airoso offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
6.9 |
|
Kiwi Ears Quartet vs. Kefine Quatio
Kefine Quatio offers better treble, dynamics and bass.
|
6.7 |
|
Kiwi Ears Quartet vs. Kiwi Ears ETUDE
Kiwi Ears ETUDE offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
6.6 |
|
Kiwi Ears Quartet vs. JUZEAR x Z Reviews Defiant
JUZEAR x Z Reviews Defiant offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
6.6 |
|
Kiwi Ears Quartet vs. Padsmith IEM
Padsmith IEM offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
|
6.6 |
|
Kiwi Ears Quartet vs. Simgot EM6L
Simgot EM6L offers better treble, details and bass.
|
6.5 |
|
Kiwi Ears Quartet vs. Letshuoer S08
Letshuoer S08 offers better treble, details and bass.
|
6.5 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
D+- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
C
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids
C
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble
D-
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics
C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Soundstage
B-
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details
C-
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging
C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming
C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review