LETSHUOER x Gizaudio Galileo [5.3/10]

Reviews (6), scores and comparisons for LETSHUOER x Gizaudio Galileo

IEMRanking.com Home LETSHUOER x Gizaudio Galileo

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision Nymz
Shuwa-T Jays Audio
Audionotions Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

5.3

Mixed to Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.2

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

Audionotions 6 Reviewer Score
Smooth and relaxing done well. Very, very pleasant, mid-focused tonality. The vocals are very good, as you'd expect of something that Timmy concocted. One can definitely hear the treble roll-off, and it makes things like percussion lose that last bit of refinement, but when you're in the mood to do nothing but relax and enjoy the music, that doesn't matter as much. Surprisingly good dynamics and transients for the price point and decently wide stage. Easy to get into, gets an easy recommendation from me. Previously Owned

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

- Audionotions
Super* Review 6* * score normalized
Shuwa-T 5.9 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
B Tech
Comment: A poor man's Diva with worse technicalities and less extension. Solid tuning, balanced throughout with slight emphasis on female vocals Treble rolls off prematurely

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: B Mids: B+ Treble: C+ Soundstage: B- Details: B Imaging: B+
Jays Audio 5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B Tech
Clean and neutral signature with empahsis in the midrange. Best vocals before Orch Lite $100-->Replaced by DZ4.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio
Precogvision 4.7 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C- Tech
Quite inoffensive but smoothed-over. Needs more resolution and sense of dynamics.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: C- Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: C- Details: C- Imaging: C-
Nymz 4.4 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
Great tuning that follows along my preferences, but falls short in the last field of the treble region. A great value overall.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

- Nymz
Bass: C- Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Details: C- Imaging: C-

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

LETSHUOER x Gizaudio Galileo Infos

Compare LETSHUOER x Gizaudio Galileo to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
LETSHUOER x Gizaudio Galileo vs. Aful Explorer
Aful Explorer offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
7.1
LETSHUOER x Gizaudio Galileo vs. Dunu Kima 2
Dunu Kima 2 offers better soundstage, mids and treble.
7
LETSHUOER x Gizaudio Galileo vs. Kiwi Ears ETUDE
Kiwi Ears ETUDE offers better dynamics, soundstage and mids.
6.6
LETSHUOER x Gizaudio Galileo vs. JUZEAR x Z Reviews Defiant
JUZEAR x Z Reviews Defiant offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
6.6
LETSHUOER x Gizaudio Galileo vs. Padsmith IEM
Padsmith IEM offers better dynamics and soundstage.
6.6
LETSHUOER x Gizaudio Galileo vs. Simgot EM6L
Simgot EM6L offers better bass, details and imaging.
6.5
LETSHUOER x Gizaudio Galileo vs. Letshuoer S08
Letshuoer S08 offers better dynamics, bass and details.
6.5
LETSHUOER x Gizaudio Galileo vs. Kiwi Ears CANTA
Kiwi Ears CANTA offers better treble, dynamics and soundstage.
6.5
LETSHUOER x Gizaudio Galileo vs. Simgot EA500LM
Simgot EA500LM offers better bass, details and imaging.
6.3
LETSHUOER x Gizaudio Galileo vs. Kefine Klanar
Kefine Klanar offers better bass, treble and soundstage.
6.3
Best IEMs from $50 - $100

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass C
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids B-
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Soundstage B-
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details C
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging C
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer