Linsoul x HBB Jupiter [8.2/10]

Reviews (4), scores and comparisons for Linsoul x HBB Jupiter

IEMRanking.com Home Ranking Linsoul x HBB Jupiter

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T
Jaytiss Bad Guy Good Audio IEMRanking AI

Average Reviewer Score:

8.2

Very Positive

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.3

Gaming Grade

B

Reviews

Jaytiss 8.6 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
Great BASS, blarg trebble.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: B Treble: A- Dynamics: S Soundstage: S-
Bad Guy Good Audio 8.1 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
check links for more info:

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
- Bad Guy Good Audio
Bass: A+ Mids: A- Treble: A-
Shuwa-T 7.4 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
Bass go boom boom Because bass go boom boom so the highs go doom doom sometimes

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: A+ Mids: A Treble: A- Soundstage: A- Details: A Imaging: A
IEMRanking AI 8.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S Tech

The Linsoul x HBB Jupiter delivers a powerful bass-forward signature with an 11dB sub-bass shelf that avoids bleeding into the mids, resulting in a warm yet articulate low end. Its hybrid driver setup combines a 10mm dynamic driver with Sonion BAs for texture and speed, while four modified EST drivers provide extended, non-fatiguing treble with excellent air and detail retrieval. Vocals and instruments retain clarity despite the bass emphasis, making it versatile across genres like rock and electronic.

Technical performance stands out with precise imaging and a spacious soundstage that feels both wide and deep. The 5-way crossover ensures strong coherence across the tribrid array, though the upper mids occasionally present vocals as overly forward. Comfort is solid despite the 11-driver shells, but the sparse accessories and forgettable packaging feel mismatched for the price.

While positioned above competitors like the ThieAudio Monarch MKIII, the Jupiter justifies its cost with superior resolution and a more engaging bass response. However, its limited marketing and awkward pricing may hinder broader adoption. The included premium cable and ergonomic design are highlights, though tip selection could be more comprehensive.

Buy Linsoul x HBB Jupiter on Linsoul (affiliate)

- IEMRanking AI

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Linsoul x HBB Jupiter Infos

Bad Guy Good Audio Reviews

Compare Linsoul x HBB Jupiter to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Linsoul x HBB Jupiter vs. Fiio FX17
Fiio FX17 offers better mids, treble and details.
9
Linsoul x HBB Jupiter vs. Thieaudio Valhalla
Thieaudio Valhalla offers better mids, imaging and details.
8.9
Linsoul x HBB Jupiter vs. Elysian Apostle
Elysian Apostle offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
8.9
Linsoul x HBB Jupiter vs. Dunu Glacier
Dunu Glacier offers better soundstage, treble and details.
8.7
Linsoul x HBB Jupiter vs. 64 Audio U12t
64 Audio U12t offers better imaging, details and mids.
8.5
Linsoul x HBB Jupiter vs. Symphonium x Elise Audio Europa
Symphonium x Elise Audio Europa offers better treble, mids and bass.
8.5
Linsoul x HBB Jupiter vs. ThieAudio Monarch MK4
ThieAudio Monarch MK4 offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
8.4
Linsoul x HBB Jupiter vs. Symphonium Crimson
Symphonium Crimson offers better imaging, mids and bass.
8.4
Linsoul x HBB Jupiter vs. ThieAudio Prestige LTD
ThieAudio Prestige LTD offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
8.3
Linsoul x HBB Jupiter vs. 64 Audio U4s
64 Audio U4s offers better mids.
8.2
Best IEMs from $1,000 - $2,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • Good technical performance. Clear separation and decent detail retrieval across various tracks. Soundstage shows reasonable width and depth.
Bass A+
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids B+
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble A-
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics S
Reference-class dynamics: perfect micro/macro contrast with lightning transients. Utterly realistic reproduction of musical energy.
Soundstage A
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Details A
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer