Mangird Tea - Reviews & Ratings
3 Reviews (C Tier | 5.2/10)
Home
Mangird Tea
Summary
Based on 3 reviews, the Mangird Tea is a decent choice according to reviewers, who see it as a safe recommendation for general listening.
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.2Mixed to Negative
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.4Gaming Grade
C+Mangird Tea Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+6BA
Tuning Type: Neutral
Price (Msrp): $300
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
6.3
Reviewer Score
B
Tuning
B+
Tech
7
Lower midrange isn't the most natural sounding
Bass: B-
Mids: B+
Treble: B
Soundstage: B+
Details: B+
Imaging: A-
Reviewed by: Crin
5
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
B-
Tech
In a weird place, tonally. Not quite wrong enough to be "wonky", but certainly not right either.
Crin Youtube Channel
Crin Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Precogvision
4.3
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C-
Tech
Pleasant enough tonality, but mediocre technicalities and very boring.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Dynamics: C-
Details: C-
Imaging: C-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Mangird Tea Infos
Discuss Mangird Tea with the community
Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Mangird Tea discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.
Compare Mangird Tea to popular alternatives
Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Mangird Tea reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Mangird Tea vs. Ziigaat Horizon
Ziigaat Horizon offers better treble, bass and dynamics.
|
7.9 |
|
Mangird Tea vs. Nice HCK Himalaya
Nice HCK Himalaya offers better dynamics, mids and details.
|
7.8 |
|
Mangird Tea vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better bass, treble and dynamics.
|
7.8 |
|
Mangird Tea vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
|
7.7 |
|
Mangird Tea vs. Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua
Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
|
7.7 |
|
Mangird Tea vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better dynamics, bass and details.
|
7.7 |
|
Mangird Tea vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
|
7.6 |
|
Mangird Tea vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Punch Audio Martilo offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
|
7.6 |
|
Mangird Tea vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Xenns Tea Pro offers better bass, treble and dynamics.
|
7.5 |
|
Mangird Tea vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better dynamics, bass and details.
|
7.5 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C+- Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.
Average Technical Grade
C+- The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Bass
C+
Low-end delivery feels competent yet unremarkable, keeping a safe profile. Low-end bloom is kept in check.
Mids
B-
Midrange performance is decent, offering balanced presence without major flaws. It works well for casual background listening.
Treble
B-
Highs come through with reasonable clarity while staying mostly smooth. Sibilance is mostly controlled.
Dynamics
C-
It maintains a steady dynamic profile that neither offends nor inspires. Swells arrive but lack drama.
Soundstage
B+
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.
Details
C+
It rides the line between musicality and analysis, occasionally letting micro-detail slip by. Complex mixes stay organized for the most part.
Imaging
B-
Stereo cues lock in more reliably, even if depth mapping remains approximate. Panning transitions smoothly across the stage.
Gaming
C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review