Mangird Tea Review & Ranking

Aggregated Scores from Top Experts & Community

IEMRanking.com Home Mangird Tea

Mangird Tea Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Crin
Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

5.2

Generally Unfavorable

Mangird Tea Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.4

Gaming Grade

C+

Review by:

Crin 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B- Tech
In a weird place, tonally. Not quite wrong enough to be "wonky", but certainly not right either.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel
- Crin

Review by:

Precogvision 4.3 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C- Tech
Pleasant enough tonality, but mediocre technicalities and very boring.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C- Details: C- Imaging: C-

Review by:

Shuwa-T 6.3 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B+ Tech
Strengths: 7. Weaknesses: Lower midrange isn't the most natural sounding.

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: B- Mids: B+ Treble: B Soundstage: B+ Details: B+ Imaging: A-

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Flawed execution of tonal character. Noticeable peaks/dips affect timbre and coherence. May suit specific genres but lacks refinement.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Competent but unremarkable. Decent detail retrieval in quieter tracks, though busy sections challenge cohesion. Imaging is average, lacking depth.
Bass C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids B-
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Soundstage B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging B-
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Top alternatives for Mangird Tea

Write own User-Review for Mangird Tea
Please to write User Reviews
Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Be the first to share your experience!