Moondrop Illumination - Reviews & Ratings

4 Reviews (C Tier | 5/10)

Home Moondrop Illumination

Summary

Based on 4 reviews, the Moondrop Illumination is a decent choice according to reviewers, who see it as a safe recommendation for general listening.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5

Mixed to Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.9

Gaming Grade

C

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 6 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B Tech
Well-tuned with natural timbre, ultimately marred by subpar detail retrieval and definition.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 4.5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C Tech
Mushy transients and imaging, basically par with their other single DDs for techniclaities.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: C-

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 4* * score rescaled + normalized

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 5.5 * score rescaled + normalized
One community member has rated the Moondrop Illumination at an average of 3.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Mixed to Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Moondrop Illumination Infos

Discuss Moondrop Illumination with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Moondrop Illumination discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Moondrop Illumination to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Moondrop Illumination reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Moondrop Illumination vs. Softears RSV MK II
Softears RSV MK II offers better imaging, bass and treble.
8.1
Moondrop Illumination vs. Thieaudio Hype 10
Thieaudio Hype 10 offers better imaging, treble and bass.
8
Moondrop Illumination vs. EPZ 530
EPZ 530 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
8
Moondrop Illumination vs. Thieaudio Origin
Thieaudio Origin offers better bass, dynamics and mids.
7.9
Moondrop Illumination vs. ORIVETI OH700VB
ORIVETI OH700VB offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.9
Moondrop Illumination vs. 7th Acoustics Supernova
7th Acoustics Supernova offers better imaging, mids and treble.
7.9
Moondrop Illumination vs. Intuaura Purple
Similar overall performance.
7.8
Moondrop Illumination vs. Aful Cantor
Aful Cantor offers better imaging, details and treble.
7.7
Moondrop Illumination vs. LetShuoer EJ07
LetShuoer EJ07 offers better imaging, mids and details.
7.7
Moondrop Illumination vs. FlipEars Legion
FlipEars Legion offers better imaging, bass and details.
7.7
Best IEMs from $600 - $1,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Bass C+
Low-end delivery feels competent yet unremarkable, keeping a safe profile. Low-end bloom is kept in check.
Mids C+
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble C+
The top end is tidy and serviceable, adding air without overdoing it. Extension is decent for casual listening.
Dynamics C+
Dynamic performance is decent, delivering respectable macro swings with limited nuance. There's a fair amount of macrodynamic swing.
Details C+
Decent detail retrieval that handles most textures while leaving some micro-information understated. Most textures come through cleanly.
Imaging C-
You can tell where things generally sit, though exact locations feel blurred. Center vocals sit mostly where expected.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer