Moondrop Kanas Pro - Reviews & Ratings

3 Reviews (B Tier | 6.1/10)

IEMRanking.com Home Moondrop Kanas Pro

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Crin
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

6.1

Mixed to Positive

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.1

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score normalized

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 6 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B- Tech
Somewhat Harman-esque in tuning, not the best in terms of resolution.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 4.3 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C- Tech
A KXXS with less treble extension and slightly poorer resolution.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: B Treble: C- Dynamics: C- Details: C- Imaging: C-

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Moondrop Kanas Pro Infos

Compare Moondrop Kanas Pro to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Moondrop Kanas Pro vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better details, dynamics and imaging.
7.6
Moondrop Kanas Pro vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better details, imaging and dynamics.
7.3
Moondrop Kanas Pro vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better dynamics, imaging and details.
7.3
Moondrop Kanas Pro vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better treble, bass and mids.
7
Moondrop Kanas Pro vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better treble, bass and dynamics.
6.9
Moondrop Kanas Pro vs. TWISTURA WoodNote
TWISTURA WoodNote offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
6.9
Moondrop Kanas Pro vs. Kiwi Ears Aether
Kiwi Ears Aether offers better treble, imaging and details.
6.9
Moondrop Kanas Pro vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better treble, bass and mids.
6.9
Moondrop Kanas Pro vs. Ziigaat Lush
Ziigaat Lush offers better treble, bass and dynamics.
6.8
Moondrop Kanas Pro vs. ZIIGAAT x HBB Arcadia
ZIIGAAT x HBB Arcadia offers better bass, treble and dynamics.
6.7
Best IEMs from $100 - $200

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Details C-
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer