Moondrop Kato - Reviews & Ratings

13 Reviews (B Tier | 6.3/10)

Home Moondrop Kato

Summary

Based on 13 reviews, the Moondrop Kato is earning a favorable overall impression from reviewers thanks to its consistent performance.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

6.3

Mixed to Positive

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.2

Gaming Grade

B

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 8.5* * score rescaled + normalized
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Moondrop Kato or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $189.99

Buy Moondrop Kato on HiFiGO

Reviewed by: Kois Archive

Kois Archive 7.2 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Rating: A- | Value: ⭐⭐ | Comfort: 9 nice female vocals treble a little lacking

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 6.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B+ Tech

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 6.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
B+ Tech

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 6.3 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
For $200, I'd probably recomend other iems. But it's solid.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: C- Soundstage: A-

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 6.2 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B Tech
Comment: Moondrop's best "budget" single DD iem. Solid tuning, backed with surprising clarity that is a step up from the kxxs bunch Lower mids thin sounding

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B Mids: B Treble: B+ Soundstage: B Details: B+ Imaging: B

Reviewed by: Yifang

Yifang 6 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
B- Tech

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 5.8 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
C+ Tech
A slight improvement over the KXXS all-round in the technical department.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: A- Treble: B Dynamics: C Details: B- Imaging: B

Reviewed by: Audionotions

Audionotions 5.5 Reviewer Score
Decent bass, decent mids, vocals presented nicely (tastefully forward), treble is non-fatiguing but a little darker but maybe a bit weird. Sounds a little blunted to my ears. Fit may be an issue for some, but tip-rolling can fix that. Build quality is excellent. The replaceable nozzles are a gimmick - they don't sound any different. Matte one is beautiful - it's a literal work of art - but be wary of the sharp edges if you have large conchas. Better than Aria, but not by much.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 5.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B+ Tech
Good detail, clarity, and imaging, but can sound thin. Similar tuning as Hana, but I found Hana to have better note-weight and bass.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 5.5 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
A- Tech
KXXS with better vocals and details

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: A+ Treble: A-

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 4.9 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
A bit thin, pillow light bass. Treble and stage could use some more refinement. A tecnical upgrade to Aria.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C- Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7.9 * score rescaled + normalized
25 community members have rated the Moondrop Kato at an average of 4.2/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Very Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Moondrop Kato Infos

Discuss Moondrop Kato with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Moondrop Kato discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Moondrop Kato to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Moondrop Kato vs. Letshuoer S12 Ultra
Letshuoer S12 Ultra offers better dynamics, details and bass.
7.6
Moondrop Kato vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, bass and details.
7.5
Moondrop Kato vs. Simgot ET142
Similar overall performance.
7.4
Moondrop Kato vs. Crinear Daybreak
Crinear Daybreak offers better dynamics, bass and details.
7.3
Moondrop Kato vs. Hidizs MP145
Hidizs MP145 offers better dynamics, details and bass.
7.3
Moondrop Kato vs. TWISTURA WoodNote
TWISTURA WoodNote offers better dynamics, mids and soundstage.
7.3
Moondrop Kato vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better imaging, details and bass.
7.2
Moondrop Kato vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better dynamics, bass and imaging.
7.2
Moondrop Kato vs. Kiwi Ears Aether
Kiwi Ears Aether offers better dynamics, imaging and bass.
7.2
Moondrop Kato vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
7.2
Best IEMs from $100 - $200

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • The tuning leans easygoing, yet occasional unevenness nudges it away from greatness. A bit of EQ polish can smooth things nicely.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Bass B-
The bass offers steady support without stepping into the spotlight. There's just enough punch for everyday playlists.
Mids B
Expect a confident midrange that keeps details audible without harshness. Acoustic arrangements sound engaging.
Treble B-
The top end is tidy and serviceable, adding air without overdoing it. Extension is decent for casual listening.
Dynamics C-
Volume swings are adequate, though they rarely feel dramatic. It won't offend, yet it won't thrill.
Soundstage B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth, placing instruments in clearly defined positions. Instruments sit in their own lanes.
Details B-
Plenty of nuance surfaces, just not the last layer of shimmer. It balances clarity with an easygoing tone.
Imaging B-
Complex mixes stay organized thanks to the improved spatial discipline. Complex passages stay intelligible.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Buy

Footer