Moondrop KXXX [5.6/10]
Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for Moondrop KXXX
IEMRanking.com
Home
Moondrop KXXX
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.6Mixed
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.2Gaming Grade
C+Moondrop KXXX Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: Mild V
Brand: Moondrop Top Moondrop IEMs
Price (Msrp): $180
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
6*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Precogvision
5.2
Reviewer Score
B-
Tuning
C+
Tech
See KXXS. Just slightly bassier.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+
Mids: A-
Treble: C+
Dynamics: C+
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Moondrop KXXX Infos
Compare Moondrop KXXX to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Moondrop KXXX vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better bass, details and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
Moondrop KXXX vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better details, imaging and bass.
|
7.3 |
|
Moondrop KXXX vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better bass, dynamics and imaging.
|
7.3 |
|
Moondrop KXXX vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better bass, treble and mids.
|
7 |
|
Moondrop KXXX vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better bass and treble.
|
7 |
|
Moondrop KXXX vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better bass, treble and dynamics.
|
6.9 |
|
Moondrop KXXX vs. TWISTURA WoodNote
Similar overall performance.
|
6.9 |
|
Moondrop KXXX vs. Kiwi Ears Aether
Kiwi Ears Aether offers better treble and dynamics.
|
6.8 |
|
Moondrop KXXX vs. Ziigaat Lush
Ziigaat Lush offers better bass, treble and dynamics.
|
6.8 |
|
Moondrop KXXX vs. ZIIGAAT x HBB Arcadia
ZIIGAAT x HBB Arcadia offers better bass.
|
6.7 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B-- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
C+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Details
C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review