Moondrop Sparks - Reviews & Ratings

4 Reviews (C Tier | 5.3/10)

Home Moondrop Sparks

Summary

Based on 4 reviews, the Moondrop Sparks is receiving steady, if unspectacular, approval from reviewers, highlighting its dependable nature.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.3

Mixed to Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.9

Gaming Grade

C

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score rescaled + normalized

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 5.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
C+ Tech
A tad too shouty and lacking low-level detail, but nothing too egregious as a whole.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
Comment: Bass and treble focused. Good tonality with moondrop house sound Bass bloom, subpar imaging and soundstage

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B- Mids: C- Treble: C+ Soundstage: C Details: B+ Imaging: C

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 4.7 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
D Tech
Solid tonal balance and great bass for a TWS.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: D Details: C- Imaging: D

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Moondrop Sparks Infos

Discuss Moondrop Sparks with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Moondrop Sparks discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Moondrop Sparks to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Moondrop Sparks reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Moondrop Sparks vs. ARTTI T10 PRO
ARTTI T10 PRO offers better soundstage, dynamics and mids.
7.1
Moondrop Sparks vs. Letshuoer S08
Letshuoer S08 offers better dynamics, imaging and soundstage.
6.8
Moondrop Sparks vs. JUZEAR x Z Reviews Defiant
JUZEAR x Z Reviews Defiant offers better dynamics, imaging and mids.
6.7
Moondrop Sparks vs. Myer Audio SLA3
Similar overall performance.
6.6
Moondrop Sparks vs. SIMGOT EG280
SIMGOT EG280 offers better imaging, dynamics and soundstage.
6.5
Moondrop Sparks vs. Rose Technics Star City 5 Pro
Rose Technics Star City 5 Pro offers better dynamics and soundstage.
6.5
Moondrop Sparks vs. Kiwi Ears CANTA
Kiwi Ears CANTA offers better treble, dynamics and soundstage.
6.5
Moondrop Sparks vs. Letshuoer DZ4
Similar overall performance.
6.5
Moondrop Sparks vs. Tanchjim 4U
Similar overall performance.
6.4
Moondrop Sparks vs. Fosi Audio IM4
Fosi Audio IM4 offers better imaging, dynamics and soundstage.
6.3
Best IEMs from $50 - $100

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • The tuning leans easygoing, yet occasional unevenness nudges it away from greatness. A bit of EQ polish can smooth things nicely.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Textural information blurs together, making the stage feel pinched and gray. Instrument edges blur together frequently.
Bass B-
Low-end delivery feels competent yet unremarkable, keeping a safe profile. Low-end bloom is kept in check.
Mids C+
Expect a competent midrange that keeps vocals grounded and instruments clear. Tone is acceptable across multiple genres.
Treble C+
The top end is tidy and serviceable, adding air without overdoing it. Extension is decent for casual listening.
Dynamics D
Expect a limited dynamic swing that keeps musical climaxes from hitting hard. Volume gradations feel artificially restrained.
Soundstage C
You get decent separation, though instruments still stand shoulder to shoulder on a shallow plane. Instrument placement is just adequate.
Details C+
Decent detail retrieval that handles most textures while leaving some micro-information understated. Most textures come through cleanly.
Imaging D+
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning that never quite nails the center image. Left/right cues exist but are rough.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer