Moondrop Stellaris - Reviews & Ratings

6 Reviews (C Tier | 5.4/10)

Home Moondrop Stellaris

Summary

Based on 6 reviews, the Moondrop Stellaris is a decent choice according to reviewers, who see it as a safe recommendation for general listening.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.4

Mixed to Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.1

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score rescaled + normalized

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 5.9 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
A- Tech
Comment: It's not winning any planar wars. Good technicalities Everything else especially the fit

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B Mids: B- Treble: D Soundstage: A- Details: A- Imaging: A-

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 4.6 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
B- Tech
Shrill and thin sounding to the point of unnaturalness.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: C- Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Details: B Imaging: B

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
Needs EQ to shine.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: D Soundstage: C+

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 4.2 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Upper-mid range focused planar with good resolving capabilities, that sadly aren't enough. Thin and agressive sound - probably 1 filter away from excelence. Nozzles and weight might be a problem for most people.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C- Mids: C- Treble: D Details: B Imaging: C+

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7.1 * score rescaled + normalized
9 community members have rated the Moondrop Stellaris at an average of 3.8/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Strongly Favorable.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Moondrop Stellaris Infos

Discuss Moondrop Stellaris with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Moondrop Stellaris discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Moondrop Stellaris to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Moondrop Stellaris vs. Dunu Kima 2
Dunu Kima 2 offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
7.4
Moondrop Stellaris vs. CCA HYDRO
CCA HYDRO offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
7.3
Moondrop Stellaris vs. Aful Explorer
Aful Explorer offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
7.3
Moondrop Stellaris vs. HIDIZS MP143
HIDIZS MP143 offers better treble, soundstage and dynamics.
7.2
Moondrop Stellaris vs. Tanchjim Fission
Tanchjim Fission offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
7.1
Moondrop Stellaris vs. ARTTI T10 PRO
ARTTI T10 PRO offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
7.1
Moondrop Stellaris vs. Tanchjim NORA
Similar overall performance.
7
Moondrop Stellaris vs. Padsmith IEM
Padsmith IEM offers better dynamics, soundstage and treble.
7
Moondrop Stellaris vs. Kiwi Ears Airoso
Kiwi Ears Airoso offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
7
Moondrop Stellaris vs. Kiwi Ears ETUDE
Kiwi Ears ETUDE offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
6.9
Best IEMs from $100 - $200

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • An honest, middle-of-the-road performance preserves structure without chasing micro-detail. It's respectable for everyday listening sessions.
Bass C+
Bass performance is average—present enough but rarely inspiring. It neither offends nor impresses.
Mids C
The region is listenable but lacks the finesse and clarity of better tuning. A touch of EQ can smooth things out.
Treble D+
The upper range behaves inconsistently, blending dullness with sudden glare. You'll notice sharp spikes alongside dips.
Dynamics C-
The system delivers passable punch but never surprises. Punch is modest rather than exciting.
Soundstage B
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.
Details B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances that keeps complex passages intelligible. Micro-details pop without sounding forced.
Imaging B
Positions lock in with confidence, sketching a believable stage map. There's a tangible sense of stage geometry.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer