Moondrop Stellaris [5/10]

Reviews (5), scores and comparisons for Moondrop Stellaris

IEMRanking.com Home Moondrop Stellaris

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision Jaytiss Nymz
Shuwa-T
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

5

Mixed to Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.1

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score normalized

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 5.9 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
A- Tech
Comment: It's not winning any planar wars. Good technicalities Everything else especially the fit

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B Mids: B- Treble: D Soundstage: A- Details: A- Imaging: A-

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 4.6 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
B- Tech
Shrill and thin sounding to the point of unnaturalness.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: C- Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Details: B Imaging: B

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
Needs EQ to shine.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: D Soundstage: C+

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 4.2 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Upper-mid range focused planar with good resolving capabilities, that sadly aren't enough. Thin and agressive sound - probably 1 filter away from excelence. Nozzles and weight might be a problem for most people.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C- Mids: C- Treble: D Details: B Imaging: C+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Moondrop Stellaris Infos

Compare Moondrop Stellaris to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Moondrop Stellaris vs. Aful Explorer
Aful Explorer offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
7.1
Moondrop Stellaris vs. Tanchjim Fission
Tanchjim Fission offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
7
Moondrop Stellaris vs. Dunu Kima 2
Dunu Kima 2 offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
7
Moondrop Stellaris vs. Kiwi Ears Airoso
Kiwi Ears Airoso offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
6.9
Moondrop Stellaris vs. Kefine Quatio
Kefine Quatio offers better dynamics, treble and bass.
6.7
Moondrop Stellaris vs. Kiwi Ears ETUDE
Kiwi Ears ETUDE offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
6.6
Moondrop Stellaris vs. JUZEAR x Z Reviews Defiant
JUZEAR x Z Reviews Defiant offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
6.6
Moondrop Stellaris vs. Padsmith IEM
Padsmith IEM offers better dynamics, soundstage and treble.
6.6
Moondrop Stellaris vs. Simgot EM6L
Simgot EM6L offers better treble, bass and mids.
6.5
Moondrop Stellaris vs. Letshuoer S08
Letshuoer S08 offers better treble, dynamics and bass.
6.5
Best IEMs from $100 - $200

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids C
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble D+
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer