ND 001 Nano - Reviews & Ratings
1 Review (D Tier | 3/10)
IEMRanking.com
Home
ND 001 Nano
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
3Very Poor
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
2.3Gaming Grade
E+ND 001 Nano Details
Driver Configuration: n/a
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $50
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
3
Reviewer Score
D
Tuning
E+
Tech
It's mids are a bit off for my liking.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: E+
Treble: E+
Dynamics: E+
Soundstage: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
ND 001 Nano Infos
Compare ND 001 Nano to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
ND 001 Nano vs. Tin Hifi C3
Similar overall performance.
|
6.5 |
|
ND 001 Nano vs. Juzear Clear
Juzear Clear offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
|
6.4 |
|
ND 001 Nano vs. 7hz Sonus
7hz Sonus offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
6.2 |
|
ND 001 Nano vs. INAWAKEN DAWN Ms
INAWAKEN DAWN Ms offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
6 |
|
ND 001 Nano vs. Kefine Delci
Kefine Delci offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
|
6 |
|
ND 001 Nano vs. Intime Sora Light
Intime Sora Light offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
6 |
|
ND 001 Nano vs. TRUTHEAR x Crinacle Zero Red
TRUTHEAR x Crinacle Zero Red offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
5.9 |
|
ND 001 Nano vs. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
5.8 |
|
ND 001 Nano vs. Kefine Klean
Kefine Klean offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
5.7 |
|
ND 001 Nano vs. CCA Rhapsody
CCA Rhapsody offers better mids and treble.
|
5.7 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
D- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
E+- Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Mids
E+
Midrange is thin and hollow with noticeable gaps. Instruments lack body and vocals sound distant and weak.
Treble
E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics
E+
Limited dynamic range with poor micro-detail. Subtle volume changes are lost, and transients lack proper attack.
Soundstage
C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Gaming
E+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review