NF Audio NA2+ [4.8/10]
Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for NF Audio NA2+
IEMRanking.com
Home
NF Audio NA2+
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.8Generally Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.2Gaming Grade
C-NF Audio NA2+ Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: Bright neutral
Brand: FAudio Top FAudio IEMs
Price (Msrp): $170
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
6*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Precogvision
3.5
Reviewer Score
D
Tuning
C
Tech
Sharp transients and solid imaging, but goes overboard with the upper-midrange and mid-treble.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D
Mids: D
Treble: D
Dynamics: C-
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
NF Audio NA2+ Infos
Compare NF Audio NA2+ to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
NF Audio NA2+ vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better bass, mids and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
NF Audio NA2+ vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better bass, mids and dynamics.
|
7.3 |
|
NF Audio NA2+ vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better bass, dynamics and treble.
|
7.3 |
|
NF Audio NA2+ vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7 |
|
NF Audio NA2+ vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7 |
|
NF Audio NA2+ vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better mids, bass and treble.
|
6.9 |
|
NF Audio NA2+ vs. TWISTURA WoodNote
TWISTURA WoodNote offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
6.9 |
|
NF Audio NA2+ vs. Kiwi Ears Aether
Kiwi Ears Aether offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
6.8 |
|
NF Audio NA2+ vs. Ziigaat Lush
Ziigaat Lush offers better mids, bass and treble.
|
6.8 |
|
NF Audio NA2+ vs. ZIIGAAT x HBB Arcadia
ZIIGAAT x HBB Arcadia offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
6.7 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
D- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids
D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble
D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics
C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Details
C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review