Noble Audio X - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (E Tier | 2.2/10)

IEMRanking.com Home Noble Audio X

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision

Average Reviewer Score:

2.2

Very Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

2.2

Gaming Grade

E+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 2.2 Reviewer Score
D- Tuning
E+ Tech
Dark, rolled-off mess.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D Mids: D Treble: E+ Dynamics: E+ Details: E+ Imaging: E+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Noble Audio X Infos

Compare Noble Audio X to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Noble Audio X vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better imaging, treble and details.
7.7
Noble Audio X vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better imaging, details and dynamics.
7.6
Noble Audio X vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.6
Noble Audio X vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better imaging, details and dynamics.
7.5
Noble Audio X vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better dynamics, treble and bass.
7.5
Noble Audio X vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better details, imaging and treble.
7.4
Noble Audio X vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
7.4
Noble Audio X vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
7.4
Noble Audio X vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better treble, details and imaging.
7.3
Noble Audio X vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Kiwi Ears Septet offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
7.3
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D-
  • Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.

Average Technical Grade

E+
  • Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Bass D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics E+
Limited dynamic range with poor micro-detail. Subtle volume changes are lost, and transients lack proper attack.
Details E+
Noticeably blurred and lacking definition. Background elements are smeared together and micro-details are inaudible.
Imaging E+
Poor instrument placement with unstable positioning. Instruments drift and lack fixed locations within the sound field.
Gaming E+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer