Oardio Starling - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (C Tier | 4.9/10)

Home Oardio Starling

Summary

Based on 1 review, the Oardio Starling is earning praise from some reviewers while others stay unconvinced, resulting in a balanced verdict.

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

4.9

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.1

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 4.9 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: C Mids: C+ Treble: C Soundstage: B- Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Oardio Starling Infos

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Expect a patchy tonal profile that makes instrumentation feel mismatched. EQ is almost mandatory to tame the response.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Bass C
It keeps the low end tidy, though energy and weight remain limited. It favors balance over excitement.
Mids C+
Expect a competent midrange that keeps vocals grounded and instruments clear. Tone is acceptable across multiple genres.
Treble C
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Soundstage B-
You start to perceive distinct rows of players even if the ceiling still feels low. Layering is present but still modest.
Details C+
Decent detail retrieval that handles most textures while leaving some micro-information understated. Most textures come through cleanly.
Imaging C+
A stable phantom center appears, lending vocals a consistent anchor. It maintains a coherent phantom center.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer