Oardio Starling IEM Review, Price & Ranking
Expert and community scores, sound signature and specs for Oardio Starling
IEMRanking.com
Home
Oardio Starling
Oardio Starling Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.9Generally Unfavorable
Oardio Starling Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.1Gaming Grade
C+Oardio Starling Details
Driver Configuration: n/a
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): n/a
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Oardio Starling reviewed by: Shuwa-T
4.9
Reviewer Score
C
Tuning
C+
Tech
check links for more info:
Bass: C
Mids: C+
Treble: C
Soundstage: B-
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Oardio Starling Infos
Sound Metrics
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
C
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Soundstage
B-
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details
C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review