Summary
Based on 2 reviews, the oBravo Cupid is a weak option in reviewers' eyes, with praise limited to narrow scenarios.
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
2.1Very Negative
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
2.4Gaming Grade
E+oBravo Cupid Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD Planar
Tuning Type: V-Shaped
Brand: OBravo Top OBravo IEMs
Price (Msrp): $270
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Crin
Reviewed by: Precogvision
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
newoBravo Cupid Infos
Discuss oBravo Cupid with the community
Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "oBravo Cupid discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.
Compare oBravo Cupid to popular alternatives
VS
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
oBravo Cupid vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7.8 |
|
oBravo Cupid vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better imaging, mids and dynamics.
|
7.7 |
|
oBravo Cupid vs. Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua
Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua offers better imaging, treble and mids.
|
7.7 |
|
oBravo Cupid vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.7 |
|
oBravo Cupid vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better dynamics, imaging and bass.
|
7.7 |
|
oBravo Cupid vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, imaging and treble.
|
7.7 |
|
oBravo Cupid vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
|
7.6 |
|
oBravo Cupid vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better dynamics, imaging and mids.
|
7.5 |
|
oBravo Cupid vs. Simgot ET142
Similar overall performance.
|
7.4 |
|
oBravo Cupid vs. INTUAURA Balance
INTUAURA Balance offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.4 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
E- Balance is severely off, producing a harsh, unpleasant listen regardless of genre. Long sessions quickly become exhausting.
Average Technical Grade
D-- A foggy, one-dimensional presentation wipes out layering and obscures the finer points of a mix. Spatial cues barely register at all.
User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review