oBravo Cupid [2.1/10]
Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for oBravo Cupid
IEMRanking.com
Home
oBravo Cupid
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
2.1Very Negative
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
2.4Gaming Grade
E+oBravo Cupid Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD Planar
Tuning Type: V-Shaped
Brand: OBravo Top OBravo IEMs
Price (Msrp): $270
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Crin
3
Reviewer Score
D-
Tuning
C-
Tech
Reviewed by: Precogvision
1.2
Reviewer Score
E-
Tuning
E-
Tech
I'd rather listen to the sound of silence than this.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: E+
Mids: E-
Treble: E-
Dynamics: E-
Details: E+
Imaging: E-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
oBravo Cupid Infos
Compare oBravo Cupid to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
oBravo Cupid vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7.7 |
|
oBravo Cupid vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, imaging and treble.
|
7.7 |
|
oBravo Cupid vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better imaging, mids and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
oBravo Cupid vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
oBravo Cupid vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
oBravo Cupid vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better imaging, mids and treble.
|
7.4 |
|
oBravo Cupid vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.4 |
|
oBravo Cupid vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better mids, treble and imaging.
|
7.3 |
|
oBravo Cupid vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Kiwi Ears Septet offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.3 |
|
oBravo Cupid vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better mids, bass and dynamics.
|
7.2 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
E- Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.
Average Technical Grade
D-- Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Bass
E+
Noticeably thin bass presence. Lacks body and texture, leaving low frequencies feeling hollow and underdeveloped.
Mids
E-
Midrange is extremely recessed and muddy. Critical vocal frequencies are buried, making lyrics hard to discern.
Treble
E-
Treble is extremely rolled off and veiled. High frequencies are barely perceptible with significant loss of detail.
Dynamics
E-
Extremely poor dynamic expression. Lacks any sense of impact or volume gradation, making music feel one-dimensional.
Details
E+
Noticeably blurred and lacking definition. Background elements are smeared together and micro-details are inaudible.
Imaging
E-
Extremely vague imaging with no localization. All elements seem to originate from a single undefined point in space.
Gaming
E+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review