oBravo Cupid - Reviews & Ratings

2 Reviews (E Tier | 2.1/10)

Home oBravo Cupid

Summary

Based on 2 reviews, the oBravo Cupid is a weak option in reviewers' eyes, with praise limited to narrow scenarios.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

2.1

Very Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

2.4

Gaming Grade

E+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 3 Reviewer Score
D- Tuning
C- Tech
Incoherent, broken imaging, overly-shouty, sharp treble, just a cacophony.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 1.2 Reviewer Score
E- Tuning
E- Tech
I'd rather listen to the sound of silence than this.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: E+ Mids: E- Treble: E- Dynamics: E- Details: E+ Imaging: E-

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

oBravo Cupid Infos

Discuss oBravo Cupid with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "oBravo Cupid discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare oBravo Cupid to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough oBravo Cupid reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
oBravo Cupid vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better mids, treble and bass.
7.8
oBravo Cupid vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better imaging, mids and dynamics.
7.7
oBravo Cupid vs. Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua
Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua offers better imaging, treble and mids.
7.7
oBravo Cupid vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.7
oBravo Cupid vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better dynamics, imaging and bass.
7.7
oBravo Cupid vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, imaging and treble.
7.7
oBravo Cupid vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
7.6
oBravo Cupid vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better dynamics, imaging and mids.
7.5
oBravo Cupid vs. Simgot ET142
Similar overall performance.
7.4
oBravo Cupid vs. INTUAURA Balance
INTUAURA Balance offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.4
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E
  • Balance is severely off, producing a harsh, unpleasant listen regardless of genre. Long sessions quickly become exhausting.

Average Technical Grade

D-
  • A foggy, one-dimensional presentation wipes out layering and obscures the finer points of a mix. Spatial cues barely register at all.
Bass E+
Low-end weight is lacking, making the presentation feel undernourished. Warm recordings turn surprisingly brittle.
Mids E-
Expect vocals to feel buried, with midrange detail swallowed by haze. You'll keep raising the volume to compensate.
Treble E-
The top end feels muffled, with air and shimmer barely audible. Ambient reverb tails are chopped short.
Dynamics E-
The set struggles to convey any punch or swell, sounding one-note. Percussion hits sound limp.
Details E+
Texture feels soft-focus as low-level information dissolves into a general haze. Complex passages turn into a fog.
Imaging E-
The image struggles to differentiate directions, so instruments smear together. Spatial clarity is almost nonexistent.
Gaming E+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer