Summary
Based on 3 reviews, the ooopusX Op.24 is serviceable yet underwhelming to reviewers, making it easy to overlook.
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
3.6Poor
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.8Gaming Grade
CooopusX Op.24 Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD+4BA
Tuning Type: U-Shaped
Price (Msrp): $49.99
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by:
Fresh Reviews
Youtube Video Summary
Op.24 goes in with a quirky two-tuning “turntable,” but both positions behave almost the same where it matters. A big 3–4 kHz elevation shoves door kicks, gunfire, and certain effects to the front, creating a shouty and fatiguing presentation that masks crucial cues. Imaging itself isn’t terrible—depth perception can even edge out Simgot’s EG280—but the weak points are separation and layering: simultaneous cues merge into a “mashed potato” blur, so tracking multiple targets behind cover becomes unreliable. The stock recessed 2-pin cable also disappoints, though it was tested here with a consistent aftermarket cable.
In Apex Legends, the overcooked presence region turns gunfire and abilities into a flashbang effect that drowns out slides, taps, and flanks, resulting in a C+. In Valorant, deathmatch feels okay at first thanks to decent imaging, but team scenarios expose the same weaknesses: abilities (e.g., orbs, flashes, concussives) spike uncomfortably and layering collapses when two sets of footsteps stack behind a wall—settling at a B-. With scores this middling, CS2 and CoD weren’t pursued; overall, Op.24’s switchable tuning doesn’t fix the core balance issues that hold it back for competitive gaming.
Fresh Reviews original ranking
Fresh Reviews Youtube ChannelReviewed by: Z-Reviews
Web Search
The ooopusX Op.24 is a budget hybrid with a 2DD+4BA array and a physical two-position tuning dial that switches electrical load between roughly 15Ω and 27Ω, indicating distinct filter networks for its modes. Core specs are ambitious for $49.99 (quoted sensitivity 127 dB/Vrms, 10–40 kHz FR), and the housings remain lightweight for long sessions. Fit and ergonomics are straightforward, reportedly ~5.2 g per side, which helps stability and isolation in daily use.
Tonally, Op.24 targets a Harman-style balance with a safe mid/treble contour and modest sub-bass lift; independent reviews describe consistent but unadventurous resolution, with the dial providing small, audible shifts rather than wholesale retunes. Technical performance is competent for the class—detail retrieval and imaging are respectable, while stage size and microdynamics are average—placing it as a solid value pick rather than a segment disruptor. Overall, the package reads as a pragmatic daily driver with useful tuning flexibility rather than a specialist, aligning with assessments from multiple third-party reviewers.
ooopusX Op.24 Infos
Discuss ooopusX Op.24 with the community
Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "ooopusX Op.24 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.
Compare ooopusX Op.24 to popular alternatives
VS
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
ooopusX Op.24 vs. KZ Zenith
KZ Zenith offers better treble, bass and imaging.
|
6.8 |
|
ooopusX Op.24 vs. KZ AM16
KZ AM16 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
6.8 |
|
ooopusX Op.24 vs. Tin Hifi C3 MK2
Tin Hifi C3 MK2 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
6.6 |
|
ooopusX Op.24 vs. Tin Hifi C3
Similar overall performance.
|
6.5 |
|
ooopusX Op.24 vs. Juzear Clear
Juzear Clear offers better soundstage.
|
6.4 |
|
ooopusX Op.24 vs. Kbear KB02
Kbear KB02 offers better bass, dynamics and soundstage.
|
6.4 |
|
ooopusX Op.24 vs. CCZ CZ10
CCZ CZ10 offers better dynamics, treble and bass.
|
6.4 |
|
ooopusX Op.24 vs. Astrotec GX100
Astrotec GX100 offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
6.3 |
|
ooopusX Op.24 vs. 7hz Sonus
7hz Sonus offers better soundstage.
|
6.3 |
|
ooopusX Op.24 vs. Apos x Community Rock Lobster
Apos x Community Rock Lobster offers better dynamics, soundstage and mids.
|
6.3 |
IEM Finder Quiz
newAverage Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C+- Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.
Average Technical Grade
C+- An honest, middle-of-the-road performance preserves structure without chasing micro-detail. It's respectable for everyday listening sessions.
User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review