ooopusX Op.24 - Reviews & Ratings

3 Reviews (D Tier | 3.6/10)

Home ooopusX Op.24

Summary

Based on 3 reviews, the ooopusX Op.24 is serviceable yet underwhelming to reviewers, making it easy to overlook.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

3.6

Poor

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.8

Gaming Grade

C

Reviews

Reviewed by: Fresh Reviews

Fresh Reviews 5* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score
Youtube Video Summary

Op.24 goes in with a quirky two-tuning “turntable,” but both positions behave almost the same where it matters. A big 3–4 kHz elevation shoves door kicks, gunfire, and certain effects to the front, creating a shouty and fatiguing presentation that masks crucial cues. Imaging itself isn’t terrible—depth perception can even edge out Simgot’s EG280—but the weak points are separation and layering: simultaneous cues merge into a “mashed potato” blur, so tracking multiple targets behind cover becomes unreliable. The stock recessed 2-pin cable also disappoints, though it was tested here with a consistent aftermarket cable.

In Apex Legends, the overcooked presence region turns gunfire and abilities into a flashbang effect that drowns out slides, taps, and flanks, resulting in a C+. In Valorant, deathmatch feels okay at first thanks to decent imaging, but team scenarios expose the same weaknesses: abilities (e.g., orbs, flashes, concussives) spike uncomfortably and layering collapses when two sets of footsteps stack behind a wall—settling at a B-. With scores this middling, CS2 and CoD weren’t pursued; overall, Op.24’s switchable tuning doesn’t fix the core balance issues that hold it back for competitive gaming.


Fresh Reviews original ranking

Fresh Reviews Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 2 * score rescaled + normalized

Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 5.2 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech

The ooopusX Op.24 is a budget hybrid with a 2DD+4BA array and a physical two-position tuning dial that switches electrical load between roughly 15Ω and 27Ω, indicating distinct filter networks for its modes. Core specs are ambitious for $49.99 (quoted sensitivity 127 dB/Vrms, 10–40 kHz FR), and the housings remain lightweight for long sessions. Fit and ergonomics are straightforward, reportedly ~5.2 g per side, which helps stability and isolation in daily use.

Tonally, Op.24 targets a Harman-style balance with a safe mid/treble contour and modest sub-bass lift; independent reviews describe consistent but unadventurous resolution, with the dial providing small, audible shifts rather than wholesale retunes. Technical performance is competent for the class—detail retrieval and imaging are respectable, while stage size and microdynamics are average—placing it as a solid value pick rather than a segment disruptor. Overall, the package reads as a pragmatic daily driver with useful tuning flexibility rather than a specialist, aligning with assessments from multiple third-party reviewers.


Bass: B- Mids: B- Treble: C Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: B- Details: B Imaging: B-

ooopusX Op.24 Infos

Discuss ooopusX Op.24 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "ooopusX Op.24 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare ooopusX Op.24 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough ooopusX Op.24 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
ooopusX Op.24 vs. KZ Zenith
KZ Zenith offers better treble, bass and imaging.
6.8
ooopusX Op.24 vs. KZ AM16
KZ AM16 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
6.8
ooopusX Op.24 vs. Tin Hifi C3 MK2
Tin Hifi C3 MK2 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
6.6
ooopusX Op.24 vs. Tin Hifi C3
Similar overall performance.
6.5
ooopusX Op.24 vs. Juzear Clear
Juzear Clear offers better soundstage.
6.4
ooopusX Op.24 vs. Kbear KB02
Kbear KB02 offers better bass, dynamics and soundstage.
6.4
ooopusX Op.24 vs. CCZ CZ10
CCZ CZ10 offers better dynamics, treble and bass.
6.4
ooopusX Op.24 vs. Astrotec GX100
Astrotec GX100 offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
6.3
ooopusX Op.24 vs. 7hz Sonus
7hz Sonus offers better soundstage.
6.3
ooopusX Op.24 vs. Apos x Community Rock Lobster
Apos x Community Rock Lobster offers better dynamics, soundstage and mids.
6.3
Best IEMs from below $50

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • An honest, middle-of-the-road performance preserves structure without chasing micro-detail. It's respectable for everyday listening sessions.
Bass B-
Low-end delivery feels competent yet unremarkable, keeping a safe profile. Low-end bloom is kept in check.
Mids B-
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble C
Treble performance is average, audible but short on refinement. There's acceptable presence but limited finesse.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage B-
Stage expands beyond the shoulders and finally hints at layers, though vertical cues stay muted. Depth cues begin to emerge.
Details B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances that keeps complex passages intelligible. Micro-details pop without sounding forced.
Imaging B-
Decent positional accuracy provides good left/right placement with an acceptable center image. Instruments stay anchored once placed.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer