ooopusX Op.24 - Reviews & Ratings

2 Reviews (C Tier | 5.2/10)

IEMRanking.com Home ooopusX Op.24

Average Reviewer Scores

Fresh Reviews IEMRanking AI

Average Reviewer Score:

5.2

Mixed to Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.5

Gaming Grade

C

Reviews

Reviewed by: Fresh Reviews

2025-09-30
Fresh Reviews 5* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score

Op.24 goes in with a quirky two-tuning “turntable,” but both positions behave almost the same where it matters. A big 3–4 kHz elevation shoves door kicks, gunfire, and certain effects to the front, creating a shouty and fatiguing presentation that masks crucial cues. Imaging itself isn’t terrible—depth perception can even edge out Simgot’s EG280—but the weak points are separation and layering: simultaneous cues merge into a “mashed potato” blur, so tracking multiple targets behind cover becomes unreliable. The stock recessed 2-pin cable also disappoints, though it was tested here with a consistent aftermarket cable.

In Apex Legends, the overcooked presence region turns gunfire and abilities into a flashbang effect that drowns out slides, taps, and flanks, resulting in a C+. In Valorant, deathmatch feels okay at first thanks to decent imaging, but team scenarios expose the same weaknesses: abilities (e.g., orbs, flashes, concussives) spike uncomfortably and layering collapses when two sets of footsteps stack behind a wall—settling at a B-. With scores this middling, CS2 and CoD weren’t pursued; overall, Op.24’s switchable tuning doesn’t fix the core balance issues that hold it back for competitive gaming.


Fresh Reviews original ranking

Fresh Reviews Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: IEMRanking AI

2025-09-30
IEMRanking AI 5.2 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech

The ooopusX Op.24 is a budget hybrid with a 2DD+4BA array and a physical two-position tuning dial that switches electrical load between roughly 15Ω and 27Ω, indicating distinct filter networks for its modes. Core specs are ambitious for $49.99 (quoted sensitivity 127 dB/Vrms, 10–40 kHz FR), and the housings remain lightweight for long sessions. Fit and ergonomics are straightforward, reportedly ~5.2 g per side, which helps stability and isolation in daily use.

Tonally, Op.24 targets a Harman-style balance with a safe mid/treble contour and modest sub-bass lift; independent reviews describe consistent but unadventurous resolution, with the dial providing small, audible shifts rather than wholesale retunes. Technical performance is competent for the class—detail retrieval and imaging are respectable, while stage size and microdynamics are average—placing it as a solid value pick rather than a segment disruptor. Overall, the package reads as a pragmatic daily driver with useful tuning flexibility rather than a specialist, aligning with assessments from multiple third-party reviewers.


Bass: B- Mids: B- Treble: C Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: B- Details: B Imaging: B-

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

ooopusX Op.24 Infos

Compare ooopusX Op.24 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
ooopusX Op.24 vs. Tin Hifi C3
Similar overall performance.
6.5
ooopusX Op.24 vs. Juzear Clear
Juzear Clear offers better soundstage.
6.4
ooopusX Op.24 vs. 7hz Sonus
7hz Sonus offers better soundstage.
6.2
ooopusX Op.24 vs. INAWAKEN DAWN Ms
INAWAKEN DAWN Ms offers better soundstage, dynamics and treble.
6
ooopusX Op.24 vs. Kefine Delci
Kefine Delci offers better soundstage.
6
ooopusX Op.24 vs. Intime Sora Light
Intime Sora Light offers better soundstage, mids and treble.
6
ooopusX Op.24 vs. Truthear x Crinacle Zero:Red
Truthear x Crinacle Zero:Red offers better treble, bass and mids.
5.9
ooopusX Op.24 vs. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
5.8
ooopusX Op.24 vs. Kefine Klean
Kefine Klean offers better soundstage, mids and treble.
5.7
ooopusX Op.24 vs. CCA Rhapsody
Similar overall performance.
5.7
Best IEMs from below $50

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B-
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids B-
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage B-
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging B-
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer