OpenAudio Mercury - Reviews & Ratings

3 Reviews (C Tier | 5.4/10)

Home OpenAudio Mercury

Summary

Based on 3 reviews, the OpenAudio Mercury is a decent choice according to reviewers, who see it as a safe recommendation for general listening.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.4

Mixed to Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.1

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Bad Guy Good Audio

Bad Guy Good Audio 7.1 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
C+ Tech
check links for more info:

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: B Treble: A-

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 5.2 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Basically a poor man's Legend X without some of the technicalities.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: B

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 4* * score rescaled + normalized

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

OpenAudio Mercury Infos

Discuss OpenAudio Mercury with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "OpenAudio Mercury discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare OpenAudio Mercury to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough OpenAudio Mercury reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
OpenAudio Mercury vs. Softears RSV MK II
Softears RSV MK II offers better details, dynamics and bass.
8.1
OpenAudio Mercury vs. Hisenior Mega5-EST
Hisenior Mega5-EST offers better details, treble and bass.
8
OpenAudio Mercury vs. Nicehck Rockies
Nicehck Rockies offers better details, mids and dynamics.
8
OpenAudio Mercury vs. EPZ 530
EPZ 530 offers better dynamics and treble.
8
OpenAudio Mercury vs. ORIVETI OH700VB
ORIVETI OH700VB offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.9
OpenAudio Mercury vs. Xenns Top Pro
Xenns Top Pro offers better details, dynamics and mids.
7.9
OpenAudio Mercury vs. Thieaudio Oracle MKIII
Thieaudio Oracle MKIII offers better details, dynamics and mids.
7.8
OpenAudio Mercury vs. Night Oblivion Butastur
Night Oblivion Butastur offers better details, imaging and bass.
7.8
OpenAudio Mercury vs. Intuaura Purple
Similar overall performance.
7.8
OpenAudio Mercury vs. LetShuoer EJ07M
LetShuoer EJ07M offers better details, bass and mids.
7.6
Best IEMs from $400 - $600

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Overall technicalities are acceptable, delivering enough clarity for casual sessions. Imaging is serviceable though not immersive.
Bass B
Bass foundation is good, adding satisfying punch without losing control. Pop and rock tracks feel lively.
Mids B
Expect a confident midrange that keeps details audible without harshness. Acoustic arrangements sound engaging.
Treble B
Treble is articulate and clean, adding excitement without harshness. It adds sparkle without harshness.
Dynamics C+
Expect solid impact overall, even if finer gradations feel a touch smoothed. Micro-details could still be sharper.
Details C+
It rides the line between musicality and analysis, occasionally letting micro-detail slip by. Complex mixes stay organized for the most part.
Imaging B
Instrument boundaries feel well carved, avoiding smear or drift. Instrument outlines feel well-defined.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer