Oriolus Forsteni - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (C Tier | 4.5/10)

IEMRanking.com Home Oriolus Forsteni

Average Reviewer Scores

Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

4.5

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
B- Tech
Spacious staging, good clarity, but thin in the mids and overly sharp.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Oriolus Forsteni Infos

Compare Oriolus Forsteni to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Oriolus Forsteni vs. Yu9 Que
Similar overall performance.
8.2
Oriolus Forsteni vs. ZiiGaat Luna
Similar overall performance.
7.9
Oriolus Forsteni vs. Dunu Vulkan 2
Similar overall performance.
7.8
Oriolus Forsteni vs. Softears Volume S
Similar overall performance.
7.7
Oriolus Forsteni vs. Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk
Similar overall performance.
7.7
Oriolus Forsteni vs. HiSenior Cano Cristales
Similar overall performance.
7.5
Oriolus Forsteni vs. Ziigaat Arcanis
Similar overall performance.
7.5
Oriolus Forsteni vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Similar overall performance.
7.5
Oriolus Forsteni vs. Yanyin Canon II
Similar overall performance.
7.5
Oriolus Forsteni vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Similar overall performance.
7.5
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer