Oriolus Isabellae - Reviews & Ratings

6 Reviews (B Tier | 6.4/10)

Home Oriolus Isabellae

Summary

Based on 6 reviews, the Oriolus Isabellae is a positive pick among reviewers, who feel it delivers a well-rounded experience.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

6.4

Mixed to Positive

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.2

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Audionotions

Audionotions 7 Reviewer Score
Beautifully sweet mids, good fun bass - maybe not the most resolving but sinfully enjoyable. Slight weirdness for some female vocals but other than that, it sounds great

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 6.7 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
A- Tech
Comment: Impressive sound from a single DD. Warm and pleasing tuning, sweet coloured vocals Treble peak may annoy some

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B Mids: A- Treble: B Soundstage: A- Details: A- Imaging: A-

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 6.3 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Awesome shimmer, and cool unique sound.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A+

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 6 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 4.3 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C Tech
Midrange doesn't sound very DD-like; more along the lines of etched and gritty perhaps due to 11kHz peak in treble.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: C- Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8 * score rescaled + normalized
8 community members have rated the Oriolus Isabellae at an average of 4.3/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Oriolus Isabellae Infos

Discuss Oriolus Isabellae with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Oriolus Isabellae discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Oriolus Isabellae to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Oriolus Isabellae vs. Softears RSV MK II
Softears RSV MK II offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
8.1
Oriolus Isabellae vs. Hisenior Mega5-EST
Hisenior Mega5-EST offers better treble, bass and dynamics.
8
Oriolus Isabellae vs. Nicehck Rockies
Nicehck Rockies offers better bass, dynamics and treble.
8
Oriolus Isabellae vs. EPZ 530
EPZ 530 offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
8
Oriolus Isabellae vs. ORIVETI OH700VB
ORIVETI OH700VB offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
7.9
Oriolus Isabellae vs. Xenns Top Pro
Xenns Top Pro offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
7.9
Oriolus Isabellae vs. Thieaudio Oracle MKIII
Thieaudio Oracle MKIII offers better dynamics, mids and bass.
7.8
Oriolus Isabellae vs. Night Oblivion Butastur
Night Oblivion Butastur offers better bass, treble and imaging.
7.8
Oriolus Isabellae vs. Intuaura Purple
Similar overall performance.
7.8
Oriolus Isabellae vs. LetShuoer EJ07M
LetShuoer EJ07M offers better bass, mids and dynamics.
7.6
Best IEMs from $400 - $600

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Bass C+
Expect a balanced but ordinary low end that avoids both extremes. Slam remains moderate and controlled.
Mids B-
Expect a competent midrange that keeps vocals grounded and instruments clear. Tone is acceptable across multiple genres.
Treble C+
Treble feels agreeable overall, bringing sparkle without significant fatigue. You get a polite sense of air.
Dynamics C
Expect modest dynamics that keep music listenable without thrill. Micro-contrast is serviceable.
Soundstage A
All dimensions bloom together, producing an expansive venue that feels carefully rendered. You can map the ensemble easily.
Details B
Nuance retrieval becomes reliable, highlighting expressive touches in every instrument. It rewards attentive listening.
Imaging B
Instrument boundaries feel well carved, avoiding smear or drift. Instrument outlines feel well-defined.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer