Oriolus Isabellae [6.1/10]
Reviews (5), scores and comparisons for Oriolus Isabellae
IEMRanking.com
Home
Oriolus Isabellae
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.1Mixed to Positive
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.2Gaming Grade
C+Oriolus Isabellae Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: Mild V-shape
Brand: Oriolus Top Oriolus IEMs
Price (Msrp): $600
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Audionotions
7
Reviewer Score
Beautifully sweet mids, good fun bass - maybe not the most resolving but sinfully enjoyable. Slight weirdness for some female vocals but other than that, it sounds great Previously Owned
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
6.7
Reviewer Score
B
Tuning
A-
Tech
Comment: Impressive sound from a single DD.
Warm and pleasing tuning, sweet coloured vocals
Treble peak may annoy some
Bass: B
Mids: A-
Treble: B
Soundstage: A-
Details: A-
Imaging: A-
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
6.3
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C+
Tech
Awesome shimmer, and cool unique sound.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Dynamics: C+
Soundstage: A+
Reviewed by: Crin
6
Reviewer Score
B+
Tuning
B
Tech
Reviewed by: Precogvision
4.3
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
C
Tech
Midrange doesn't sound very DD-like; more along the lines of etched and gritty perhaps due to 11kHz peak in treble.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C-
Mids: C+
Treble: C-
Dynamics: C-
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Oriolus Isabellae Infos
Compare Oriolus Isabellae to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Oriolus Isabellae vs. Softears RSV MK II
Softears RSV MK II offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
|
8.3 |
|
Oriolus Isabellae vs. NiceHCK Rockies
NiceHCK Rockies offers better bass, treble and mids.
|
8.1 |
|
Oriolus Isabellae vs. Hisenior Mega5-EST
Hisenior Mega5-EST offers better treble, bass and dynamics.
|
7.9 |
|
Oriolus Isabellae vs. Xenns Top Pro
Xenns Top Pro offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
|
7.9 |
|
Oriolus Isabellae vs. Thieaudio Oracle MKIII
Thieaudio Oracle MKIII offers better dynamics, mids and bass.
|
7.7 |
|
Oriolus Isabellae vs. EPZ 530
EPZ 530 offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
7.7 |
|
Oriolus Isabellae vs. Night Oblivion Butastur
Night Oblivion Butastur offers better bass, treble and imaging.
|
7.6 |
|
Oriolus Isabellae vs. Moondrop S8
Moondrop S8 offers better treble, details and mids.
|
7.6 |
|
Oriolus Isabellae vs. Moondrop Variations
Moondrop Variations offers better treble, bass and dynamics.
|
7.5 |
|
Oriolus Isabellae vs. Sennheiser IE600
Sennheiser IE600 offers better bass, dynamics and treble.
|
7.5 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B-- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B-- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
B-
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
C
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Soundstage
A
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Details
B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging
B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming
C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review