Penon Quattro - Reviews & Ratings
1 Review (B Tier | 6.3/10)
Home
Penon Quattro
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.3Mixed to Positive
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.8Gaming Grade
CPenon Quattro Details
Driver Configuration: 4DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $399
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
2025-10-02
6.3
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C+
Tech
Mid range is wonky, interesting but not good.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Dynamics: A-
Soundstage: B
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Penon Quattro Infos
Compare Penon Quattro to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Penon Quattro vs. Yu9 Que
Yu9 Que offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
8.2 |
|
Penon Quattro vs. ZiiGaat Luna
ZiiGaat Luna offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.9 |
|
Penon Quattro vs. Dunu Vulkan 2
Dunu Vulkan 2 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.8 |
|
Penon Quattro vs. Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk
Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
|
7.7 |
|
Penon Quattro vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.7 |
|
Penon Quattro vs. HiSenior Cano Cristales
HiSenior Cano Cristales offers better treble, soundstage and mids.
|
7.5 |
|
Penon Quattro vs. Ziigaat Arcanis
Ziigaat Arcanis offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.5 |
|
Penon Quattro vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Xenns Tea Pro offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
|
7.5 |
|
Penon Quattro vs. Yanyin Canon II
Similar overall performance.
|
7.5 |
|
Penon Quattro vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Punch Audio Martilo offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.5 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
C+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
A-
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Soundstage
B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming
C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review