Periodic Audio Be [4/10]

Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for Periodic Audio Be

IEMRanking.com Home Periodic Audio Be

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

4

Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.3

Gaming Grade

C-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
Meaty with decent sparkle in the treble, whilst remaining clear and clean.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D- Tech
Bloated bass with a passable sound signature and poor imaging and detailing.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: D Treble: D Dynamics: D Details: D Imaging: E+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Periodic Audio Be Infos

Compare Periodic Audio Be to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Periodic Audio Be vs. Dunu Vulkan 2
Dunu Vulkan 2 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.8
Periodic Audio Be vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better mids, treble and imaging.
7.7
Periodic Audio Be vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better imaging, details and mids.
7.6
Periodic Audio Be vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Xenns Tea Pro offers better treble, mids and bass.
7.5
Periodic Audio Be vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
7.5
Periodic Audio Be vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Punch Audio Martilo offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
7.5
Periodic Audio Be vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better imaging, details and mids.
7.4
Periodic Audio Be vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
7.4
Periodic Audio Be vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better imaging, mids and treble.
7.3
Periodic Audio Be vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Kiwi Ears Septet offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
7.3
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging E+
Poor instrument placement with unstable positioning. Instruments drift and lack fixed locations within the sound field.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer