Periodic Audio Be - Reviews & Ratings

3 Reviews (C Tier | 4.8/10)

Home Periodic Audio Be

Summary

Based on 3 reviews, the Periodic Audio Be is earning praise from some reviewers while others stay unconvinced, resulting in a balanced verdict.

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Crin
Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

4.8

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.3

Gaming Grade

C-

Periodic Audio Be Details

Driver Configuration: 1DD

Tuning Type: V-Shaped

Top V-Shaped IEMs

Brand: Periodic Audio Top Periodic Audio IEMs

Price (Msrp): $300

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
Meaty with decent sparkle in the treble, whilst remaining clear and clean.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D- Tech
Bloated bass with a passable sound signature and poor imaging and detailing.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: D Treble: D Dynamics: D Details: D Imaging: E+

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.5 * score rescaled + normalized
2 community members have rated the Periodic Audio Be at an average of 3.5/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Generally Favorable.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Periodic Audio Be Infos

Discuss Periodic Audio Be with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Periodic Audio Be discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Periodic Audio Be to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Periodic Audio Be reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Periodic Audio Be vs. Ziigaat Horizon
Ziigaat Horizon offers better imaging, treble and details.
Show Ziigaat Horizon
 7.9
Periodic Audio Be vs. Nice HCK Himalaya
Nice HCK Himalaya offers better imaging, mids and dynamics.
Show Nice HCK Himalaya
 7.8
Periodic Audio Be vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better mids, treble and imaging.
Show Softears Volume S
 7.8
Periodic Audio Be vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better imaging, details and mids.
Show Kiwi Ears Astral
 7.7
Periodic Audio Be vs. Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua
Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua offers better imaging, details and treble.
Show Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua
 7.7
Periodic Audio Be vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better imaging, dynamics and details.
Show Epz K9
 7.7
Periodic Audio Be vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better imaging, mids and dynamics.
Show ZiiGaat Crescent
 7.6
Periodic Audio Be vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Punch Audio Martilo offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
Show Punch Audio Martilo
 7.6
Periodic Audio Be vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Xenns Tea Pro offers better treble, mids and bass.
Show Xenns Tea Pro
 7.5
Periodic Audio Be vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better imaging, dynamics and details.
Show MYER SL224
 7.5
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Bass C-
The bass remains polite, offering definition without much drive. Dynamics remain gentle even at higher volume.
Mids D
Mid frequencies swing wildly, colouring vocals and instruments unpredictably. Instruments trade places unpredictably.
Treble D
Highs feel erratic, with dips and spikes that make the signature unpredictable. It alternates between splashy and dull.
Dynamics D
Dynamics sound noticeably compressed, muting contrast between quiet and loud. Transients feel blunted and slow.
Details D
It can follow the main lines but loses composure once arrangements become busy. Fine articulation is frequently glossed over.
Imaging E+
Layering blurs because positional cues can't stay locked in place. Layering suffers from constant smearing.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer