Prisma Azul [5.7/10]
Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for Prisma Azul
IEMRanking.com
Home
Prisma Azul
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.7Mixed
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.9Gaming Grade
B-Prisma Azul Details
Driver Configuration: 2BA
Tuning Type: Neutral
Price (Msrp): $300
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Crin
6
Reviewer Score
A
Tuning
B-
Tech
A well-balanced neutral monitor bottlenecked by sheer resolution and narrow imaging performance.
Crin Youtube Channel
Crin Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Precogvision
5.4
Reviewer Score
B-
Tuning
B-
Tech
Excellent treble extension; almost too much. Could use work in the imaging department.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+
Mids: B
Treble: B
Dynamics: B
Details: B
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Prisma Azul Infos
Compare Prisma Azul to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Prisma Azul vs. Dunu Vulkan 2
Dunu Vulkan 2 offers better mids and treble.
|
7.8 |
|
Prisma Azul vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7.7 |
|
Prisma Azul vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better imaging, bass and details.
|
7.6 |
|
Prisma Azul vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better bass, imaging and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
Prisma Azul vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Xenns Tea Pro offers better bass, treble and mids.
|
7.5 |
|
Prisma Azul vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better bass, dynamics and mids.
|
7.5 |
|
Prisma Azul vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Punch Audio Martilo offers better bass, dynamics and mids.
|
7.5 |
|
Prisma Azul vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better bass, imaging and details.
|
7.4 |
|
Prisma Azul vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics.
|
7.4 |
|
Prisma Azul vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better bass, imaging and mids.
|
7.3 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B-- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble
B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics
B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Details
B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review