QCY T5 - Reviews & Ratings
2 Reviews (D Tier | 3.3/10)
IEMRanking.com
Home
QCY T5
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
3.3Very Poor
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3.1Gaming Grade
DQCY T5 Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: Neutral
Price (Msrp): $35
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Crin
5
Reviewer Score
B
Tuning
C
Tech
An odd take on a reference-style signature, but definitely not the worst attempt out there.
Crin Youtube Channel
Crin Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Nymz
1.5
Reviewer Score
E+
Tuning
E-
Tech
Very nice tuning for a cheap TWS. Lacks technology but sounds better than some budget IEMs on the market. Bass has elevation but is weak. Timbre is ok. Insane for the price on sale (I paid 10€).
Bass: E+
Mids: E+
Treble: E+
Details: E-
Imaging: E-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
QCY T5 Infos
Compare QCY T5 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
QCY T5 vs. 7Hz Elua Ultra
7Hz Elua Ultra offers better mids and treble.
|
6.7 |
|
QCY T5 vs. Moondrop Crescent
Similar overall performance.
|
6.3 |
|
QCY T5 vs. Kinera Celest Wyvern Black
Similar overall performance.
|
5.8 |
|
QCY T5 vs. KZ D-Fi
KZ D-Fi offers better details, imaging and mids.
|
5.7 |
|
QCY T5 vs. Simgot EW200
Simgot EW200 offers better details, imaging and bass.
|
5.5 |
|
QCY T5 vs. Ziigaat Nuo
Ziigaat Nuo offers better mids and treble.
|
5.4 |
|
QCY T5 vs. Kinera Celest Wyvern Abyss
Kinera Celest Wyvern Abyss offers better mids and treble.
|
5.4 |
|
QCY T5 vs. Kiwi Ears CADENZA
Kiwi Ears CADENZA offers better bass, mids and details.
|
5.3 |
|
QCY T5 vs. CCA Trio
CCA Trio offers better mids and treble.
|
5.3 |
|
QCY T5 vs. 7HZ G1
7HZ G1 offers better mids and treble.
|
5.3 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C-- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
D-- Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Bass
E+
Noticeably thin bass presence. Lacks body and texture, leaving low frequencies feeling hollow and underdeveloped.
Mids
E+
Midrange is thin and hollow with noticeable gaps. Instruments lack body and vocals sound distant and weak.
Treble
E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Details
E-
Extremely poor resolution. Fine details are completely lost, leaving only a vague impression of the music's structure.
Imaging
E-
Extremely vague imaging with no localization. All elements seem to originate from a single undefined point in space.
Gaming
D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review