QCY T5 Review & Ranking
Aggregated Scores from Top Experts & Community
IEMRanking.com
Home
QCY T5
QCY T5 Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
3.3Negative
QCY T5 Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3.1Gaming Grade
DQCY T5 Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: Neutral
Price (Msrp): $35
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
QCY T5 reviewed by: Crin
5
Reviewer Score
B
Tuning
C
Tech
An odd take on a reference-style signature, but definitely not the worst attempt out there. Crin Youtube Channel
QCY T5 reviewed by: Nymz
1.5
Reviewer Score
E+
Tuning
E-
Tech
Very nice tuning for a cheap TWS. Lacks technology but sounds better than some budget IEMs on the market. Bass has elevation but is weak. Timbre is ok. Insane for the price on sale (I paid 10€).
Bass: E+
Mids: E+
Treble: E+
Details: E-
Imaging: E-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
QCY T5 Infos
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C-- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
D-- Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Bass
E+
Noticeably thin bass presence. Lacks body and texture, leaving low frequencies feeling hollow and underdeveloped.
Mids
E+
Midrange is thin and hollow with noticeable gaps. Instruments lack body and vocals sound distant and weak.
Treble
E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Details
E-
Extremely poor resolution. Fine details are completely lost, leaving only a vague impression of the music's structure.
Imaging
E-
Extremely vague imaging with no localization. All elements seem to originate from a single undefined point in space.
Gaming
D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
Top alternatives for QCY T5
| IEM | Price | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Moondrop Crescent | $30 | 6.3 |
| Kinera Celest Wyvern Black | $29 | 5.8 |
| KZ D-Fi | $33 | 5.7 |
| Simgot EW200 | $39 | 5.5 |
| Ziigaat Nuo | $30 | 5.4 |
| CCA Trio | $30 | 5.3 |
| 7HZ G1 | $35 | 5.3 |
| BLON x HBB Z300 | $35 | 5.1 |
| Moondrop Lan | $40 | 5 |
| Blon BL03 | $39 | 4.8 |
Write own User-Review for QCY T5
Please sign in with google to write User Reviews
IEM Comparison Tool new
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
Compare QCY T5 to popular alternatives
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
| QCY T5 vs. Moondrop Crescent | 6.3 |
| QCY T5 vs. Kinera Celest Wyvern Black | 5.8 |
| QCY T5 vs. KZ D-Fi | 5.7 |
| QCY T5 vs. Simgot EW200 | 5.5 |
| QCY T5 vs. Ziigaat Nuo | 5.4 |
| QCY T5 vs. CCA Trio | 5.3 |
| QCY T5 vs. 7HZ G1 | 5.3 |
| QCY T5 vs. BLON x HBB Z300 | 5.1 |
| QCY T5 vs. Moondrop Lan | 5 |
| QCY T5 vs. Blon BL03 | 4.8 |
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Be the first to share your experience!