QDC Neptune [4.8/10]

Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for QDC Neptune

IEMRanking.com Home QDC Neptune

Average Reviewer Scores

Super* Review
Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

4.8

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.7

Gaming Grade

B-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 5.5 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B- Tech
Tuning and configuration is simple but goes a long way when implemented well.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 4* * score normalized

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

QDC Neptune Infos

Compare QDC Neptune to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
QDC Neptune vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Similar overall performance.
7.7
QDC Neptune vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Similar overall performance.
7.6
QDC Neptune vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Similar overall performance.
7.6
QDC Neptune vs. CrinEar Daybreak
Similar overall performance.
7.3
QDC Neptune vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
Similar overall performance.
7.3
QDC Neptune vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
Similar overall performance.
7.2
QDC Neptune vs. EPZ P50
Similar overall performance.
7
QDC Neptune vs. BQEYZ Winter
Similar overall performance.
7
QDC Neptune vs. Pula PA02
Similar overall performance.
7
QDC Neptune vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Similar overall performance.
6.9
Best IEMs from $100 - $200

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer