qdc Superior IEM Review, Price & Ranking

Expert and community scores, sound signature and specs for qdc Superior

IEMRanking.com Home qdc Superior
My Ranking My Favorites

qdc Superior Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

5

Mixed to Negative

qdc Superior Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.1

Gaming Grade

C+

qdc Superior Details

Driver Configuration: n/a

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): n/a

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Hifigo
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

qdc Superior reviewed by:

Shuwa-T 5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C Soundstage: C+ Details: B- Imaging: C+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

qdc Superior Infos

Sound Metrics

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details B-
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer