qdc Uranus [4/10]
Reviews (3), scores and comparisons for qdc Uranus
IEMRanking.com
Home
qdc Uranus
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.2Gaming Grade
C-qdc Uranus Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+1BA
Tuning Type: Warm V
Brand: QDC Top QDC IEMs
Price (Msrp): $220
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Crin
5
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
B-
Tech
Sounds like another variation of the qdc Fusion. Not sure which is worse though.
Crin Youtube Channel
Crin Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Super* Review
4*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Precogvision
3
Reviewer Score
D
Tuning
D
Tech
Just another V-shaped tuning with low-level detailing.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D
Mids: D
Treble: D
Dynamics: D
Details: D
Imaging: D
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
qdc Uranus Infos
Compare qdc Uranus to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
qdc Uranus vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better bass, mids and imaging.
|
7.7 |
|
qdc Uranus vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, bass and treble.
|
7.6 |
|
qdc Uranus vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better bass, details and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
qdc Uranus vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.4 |
|
qdc Uranus vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7.3 |
|
qdc Uranus vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better bass, dynamics and imaging.
|
7.3 |
|
qdc Uranus vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better bass, mids and dynamics.
|
7.2 |
|
qdc Uranus vs. Ziigaat Odyssey 2
Ziigaat Odyssey 2 offers better bass, mids and details.
|
7.1 |
|
qdc Uranus vs. ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews
ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.1 |
|
qdc Uranus vs. Letshuoer Cadenza 4
Letshuoer Cadenza 4 offers better mids, details and imaging.
|
7.1 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C-- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C-- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids
D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble
D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics
D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details
D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging
D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming
C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review