Quill Acoustics Satin [8.2/10]
Reviews (1), scores and comparisons for Quill Acoustics Satin
IEMRanking.com
Home
Quill Acoustics Satin
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
8.2Very Positive
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.7Gaming Grade
B+Quill Acoustics Satin Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+7BA+1BC+1PL
Tuning Type: Neutral
Price (Msrp): $3,000
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Smirk Audio
8.2
Reviewer Score
A+
Tuning
A+
Tech
check links for more info:
Bass: S-
Mids: S-
Treble: A+
Dynamics: A
Details: S-
Imaging: S-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Quill Acoustics Satin Infos
Compare Quill Acoustics Satin to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Quill Acoustics Satin vs. Elysian Annihilator 2023
Elysian Annihilator 2023 offers better treble, details and dynamics.
|
9 |
|
Quill Acoustics Satin vs. Softears Enigma
Softears Enigma offers better dynamics, treble and bass.
|
9 |
|
Quill Acoustics Satin vs. Thieaudio Valhalla
Thieaudio Valhalla offers better dynamics and imaging.
|
8.9 |
|
Quill Acoustics Satin vs. Elysian Annihilator 2021
Elysian Annihilator 2021 offers better treble, dynamics and details.
|
8.8 |
|
Quill Acoustics Satin vs. Canpur CP622B
Canpur CP622B offers better details, dynamics and bass.
|
8.7 |
|
Quill Acoustics Satin vs. Campire Audio Clara Ti
Campire Audio Clara Ti offers better dynamics, treble and bass.
|
8.6 |
|
Quill Acoustics Satin vs. 64 Audio U12t
64 Audio U12t offers better imaging, details and dynamics.
|
8.5 |
|
Quill Acoustics Satin vs. Kinera Imperial Loki
Kinera Imperial Loki offers better bass and details.
|
8.5 |
|
Quill Acoustics Satin vs. Forte Ears Macbeth
Forte Ears Macbeth offers better treble, dynamics and details.
|
8.5 |
|
Quill Acoustics Satin vs. Empire Ears Raven
Empire Ears Raven offers better details, imaging and dynamics.
|
8.5 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A+- Refined execution with coherent frequency integration. Natural timbre reproduction and engaging presentation. Strong versatility.
Average Technical Grade
A+- Very competent with articulate presentation. Well-defined layers and precise imaging. Soundstage is immersive and handles dynamics well.
Bass
S-
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids
S-
Superb midrange that's rich and resolving. Exceptional transparency and micro-details with perfect vocal/instrument balance.
Treble
A+
Superb treble: effortless extension with crystal clarity. Perfect balance of sparkle and smoothness with exceptional detail.
Dynamics
A
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Details
S-
Exceptional resolution that uncovers the deepest layers. Retrieves even the most minute details while maintaining natural timbre.
Imaging
S-
Exceptional imaging with holographic precision. Creates a palpable sense of physical placement with perfect positional stability.
Gaming
B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review