IEMRanking.com
Home
Raptgo Hook-X
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6Mixed to Positive
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.7Gaming Grade
B-Raptgo Hook-X Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: Mild V
Brand: RAPTGO Top RAPTGO IEMs
Price (Msrp): $240
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
Comment: Interesting take on open backed planar iem, currently leading the charge for planar iems < $500.
Well tuned, with very respectable technicalities to back up. More technicalities focused.
Some sound leakage from open-backed design, but not much. Somewhat fuzzy midrange.
Bass: B
Mids: B-
Treble: B
Soundstage: A-
Details: A-
Imaging: A-
Reviewed by:
Fresh Reviews
Reviewed by: Z-Reviews
Reviewed by: Tim Tuned
Reviewed by: Precogvision
Sounds similar to the Timeless with a smoother sound, less detail, and better imaging (seems less congested).
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+
Mids: B
Treble: B
Dynamics: C+
Details: B
Imaging: B
Reviewed by: Nymz
A more analog but less resolving than S12/Timeless, yet better tuned. Stage is fine thanks to the semi-open design and better than its competition.
Bass: C+
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
Cool concept. I love the presentation and the sound, just not the price.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+
Treble: D
Dynamics: C-
Soundstage: B
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Raptgo Hook-X Infos
Compare Raptgo Hook-X to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
Raptgo Hook-X vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
7.7 |
Raptgo Hook-X vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.6 |
Raptgo Hook-X vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, bass and details.
|
7.6 |
Raptgo Hook-X vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
|
7.5 |
Raptgo Hook-X vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
|
7.4 |
Raptgo Hook-X vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
7.3 |
Raptgo Hook-X vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Kiwi Ears Septet offers better dynamics and soundstage.
|
7.3 |
Raptgo Hook-X vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better dynamics, bass and imaging.
|
7.3 |
Raptgo Hook-X vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better dynamics, mids and bass.
|
7.2 |
Raptgo Hook-X vs. TANCHJIM x Effect Audio Force
TANCHJIM x Effect Audio Force offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
|
7.1 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B-- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B-- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids
B-
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
C
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Soundstage
B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details
B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging
B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming
B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review