Rose Br5 Mk2 - Reviews & Ratings
2 Reviews (C Tier | 4.9/10)
IEMRanking.com
Home
Rose Br5 Mk2
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.9Generally Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.7Gaming Grade
CRose Br5 Mk2 Details
Driver Configuration: 5BA
Tuning Type: Neutral
Price (Msrp): $305
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
5.2
Reviewer Score
C
Tuning
B-
Tech
Comment: Known to have MMCX connector issues.
Treble too spicy, BA timbre prominent
Bass: C-
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Soundstage: B
Details: B-
Imaging: B-
Reviewed by: Crin
4.5
Reviewer Score
C
Tuning
C
Tech
Not a bad IEM, though plagued by BA timbre. Not the most technical but it does the job when called for it.
Crin Youtube Channel
Crin Youtube Channel
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Rose Br5 Mk2 Infos
Compare Rose Br5 Mk2 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Rose Br5 Mk2 vs. Dunu Vulkan 2
Dunu Vulkan 2 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.8 |
|
Rose Br5 Mk2 vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7.7 |
|
Rose Br5 Mk2 vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better bass, mids and imaging.
|
7.6 |
|
Rose Br5 Mk2 vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better bass, imaging and details.
|
7.5 |
|
Rose Br5 Mk2 vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Xenns Tea Pro offers better bass, treble and mids.
|
7.5 |
|
Rose Br5 Mk2 vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
Rose Br5 Mk2 vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Punch Audio Martilo offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
Rose Br5 Mk2 vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7.4 |
|
Rose Br5 Mk2 vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.4 |
|
Rose Br5 Mk2 vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better soundstage, mids and treble.
|
7.4 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Soundstage
B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details
B-
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
B-
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review