IEMRanking.com
Home
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.8Mixed
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5Gaming Grade
C+ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $43
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Great details and bass, so fun. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Dynamics: B
Soundstage: B
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Infos
Compare ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. Tin Hifi C3
Similar overall performance.
|
6.5 |
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. Juzear Clear
Similar overall performance.
|
6.4 |
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. INAWAKEN DAWN Ms
INAWAKEN DAWN Ms offers better soundstage.
|
6 |
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. Kefine Klean
Kefine Klean offers better mids and soundstage.
|
5.7 |
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. CCA Rhapsody
Similar overall performance.
|
5.7 |
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. HBB KZ PR2
Similar overall performance.
|
5.5 |
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. EPZ Q5
Similar overall performance.
|
5.5 |
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. Simgot EW200
Simgot EW200 offers better mids and treble.
|
5.5 |
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. Truthear x Crinacle Zero
Truthear x Crinacle Zero offers better mids.
|
5.4 |
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. Kiwi Ears CADENZA
Kiwi Ears CADENZA offers better mids and treble.
|
5.3 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
C+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage
B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming
C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review