ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra [5.8/10]

Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra

IEMRanking.com Home ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra

Average Reviewer Scores

Z-Reviews
Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

5.8

Mixed

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

Jaytiss 6 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Great details and bass, so fun.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: B
Z-Reviews 5.5 * score normalized

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Infos

Compare ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. Tin Hifi C3
Similar overall performance.
6.5
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. Juzear Clear
Similar overall performance.
6.4
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. INAWAKEN DAWN Ms
INAWAKEN DAWN Ms offers better soundstage.
6
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. Kefine Klean
Kefine Klean offers better mids and soundstage.
5.7
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. CCA Rhapsody
Similar overall performance.
5.7
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. HBB KZ PR2
Similar overall performance.
5.5
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. EPZ Q5
Similar overall performance.
5.5
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. Simgot EW200
Simgot EW200 offers better mids and treble.
5.5
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. Truthear x Crinacle Zero
Truthear x Crinacle Zero offers better mids.
5.4
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra vs. Kiwi Ears CADENZA
Kiwi Ears CADENZA offers better mids and treble.
5.3
Best IEMs from below $50

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer