Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro [5.6/10]

Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro

IEMRanking.com Home Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro
My Ranking My Favorites

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

5.6

Mixed

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.3

Gaming Grade

C+

Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro Details

Driver Configuration: 2DD

Tuning Type: Warm V-shape

Price (Msrp): $200

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 6.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
B Tech
More lower mids than your average Harman-tuned IEM, but works in its favour by being more pleasant.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 4.7 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
D Tech
A warmer interpretation of the Harman curve and pretty horrible imaging.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B Mids: C+ Treble: B Dynamics: D Details: C+ Imaging: E+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro Infos

Compare Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better imaging, dynamics and mids.
Show Aful Performer 5+2
 7.7
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better dynamics, mids and bass.
Show Ziigaat Odyssey
 7.6
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better imaging, dynamics and details.
Show Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
 7.6
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better imaging, dynamics and details.
Show CrinEar Daybreak
 7.3
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better imaging, dynamics and details.
Show DUNU x KOTO ITO
 7.3
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better dynamics, mids and bass.
Show FATfreq x HBB Deuce
 7.2
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better mids, bass and dynamics.
Show EPZ P50
 7
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro vs. BQEYZ Winter
Similar overall performance.
Show BQEYZ Winter
 7
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better mids, dynamics and bass.
Show Pula PA02
 7
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better dynamics, mids and bass.
Show Kiwi Ears KE4
 6.9
Best IEMs from $100 - $200

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging E+
Poor instrument placement with unstable positioning. Instruments drift and lack fixed locations within the sound field.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer