Seeaudio Yume [5.5/10]
Reviews (5), scores and comparisons for Seeaudio Yume
IEMRanking.com
Home
Seeaudio Yume
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.5Mixed
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.5Gaming Grade
B-Seeaudio Yume Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+2BA
Tuning Type: Neutral
Brand: SeeAudio Top SeeAudio IEMs
Price (Msrp): $170
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jays Audio
7
Reviewer Score
A+
Tuning
A-
Tech
Vocal benchmark along with EPZ P50 until Volume S, OG Oracles and RSV for most - natural and open vocals. Midranged focus, can use better bass texture and treble extension.
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Super* Review
6*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Tim Tuned
5
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
B
Tech
Great tonal balance with beautiful vocals
Yume Midnight exist
Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: B
Mids: S
Treble: B
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
5
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C+
Tech
Comment: One trick pony.
Extremely well tuned
Literally everything else
Bass: C-
Mids: B
Treble: C+
Soundstage: B-
Details: C-
Imaging: B-
Reviewed by: Precogvision
4.6
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
D+
Tech
Class-leading tonal balance butchered by subpar technicalities.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D
Mids: A-
Treble: C+
Dynamics: C-
Details: C-
Imaging: D
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Seeaudio Yume Infos
Compare Seeaudio Yume to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Seeaudio Yume vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better details, dynamics and bass.
|
7.6 |
|
Seeaudio Yume vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better details, imaging and dynamics.
|
7.3 |
|
Seeaudio Yume vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better dynamics, bass and details.
|
7.3 |
|
Seeaudio Yume vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better bass, treble and soundstage.
|
7 |
|
Seeaudio Yume vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better bass, soundstage and treble.
|
7 |
|
Seeaudio Yume vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better bass, dynamics and soundstage.
|
6.9 |
|
Seeaudio Yume vs. TWISTURA WoodNote
TWISTURA WoodNote offers better soundstage and dynamics.
|
6.9 |
|
Seeaudio Yume vs. Kiwi Ears Aether
Kiwi Ears Aether offers better treble, soundstage and dynamics.
|
6.8 |
|
Seeaudio Yume vs. Ziigaat Lush
Ziigaat Lush offers better bass, dynamics and soundstage.
|
6.8 |
|
Seeaudio Yume vs. ZIIGAAT x HBB Arcadia
ZIIGAAT x HBB Arcadia offers better bass and dynamics.
|
6.7 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B-- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
C+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids
A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Soundstage
B-
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details
C-
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging
C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming
B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review