Sennheiser IE 200 [5/10]
Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for Sennheiser IE 200
IEMRanking.com
Home
Sennheiser IE 200
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5Mixed to Negative
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
2.6Gaming Grade
D-Sennheiser IE 200 Details
Driver Configuration: n/a
Tuning Type: V-shape
Brand: Sennheiser Top Sennheiser IEMs
Price (Msrp): $150
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
6*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
4
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
E+
Tech
Just not for me. Tried multiple times, never found engaging.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+
Treble: E+
Dynamics: E+
Soundstage: B
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Sennheiser IE 200 Infos
Compare Sennheiser IE 200 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Sennheiser IE 200 vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
7.3 |
|
Sennheiser IE 200 vs. Aful Explorer
Aful Explorer offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
7.1 |
|
Sennheiser IE 200 vs. Tanchjim Fission
Tanchjim Fission offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
7 |
|
Sennheiser IE 200 vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
7 |
|
Sennheiser IE 200 vs. Dunu Kima 2
Dunu Kima 2 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
7 |
|
Sennheiser IE 200 vs. Kiwi Ears Airoso
Kiwi Ears Airoso offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
6.9 |
|
Sennheiser IE 200 vs. Kiwi Ears Aether
Kiwi Ears Aether offers better treble, dynamics and soundstage.
|
6.8 |
|
Sennheiser IE 200 vs. Ziigaat Lush
Ziigaat Lush offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
6.8 |
|
Sennheiser IE 200 vs. Truthear Nova
Truthear Nova offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
6.7 |
|
Sennheiser IE 200 vs. Kefine Quatio
Kefine Quatio offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
6.7 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C-- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
E+- Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics
E+
Limited dynamic range with poor micro-detail. Subtle volume changes are lost, and transients lack proper attack.
Soundstage
B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming
D-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review