Sennheiser IE300 - Reviews & Ratings

2 Reviews (B Tier | 5.5/10)

Home Sennheiser IE300

Summary

Based on 2 reviews, the Sennheiser IE300 is a sensible option among reviewers, especially for listeners seeking balance without drama.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.5

Mixed

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.2

Gaming Grade

B

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 6 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B Tech
Fairly mainstream tuning with a treble response that's well done given its emphasis.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
A- Tech
Extremely comforable fit and versatile signature

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: A-

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Sennheiser IE300 Infos

Discuss Sennheiser IE300 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Sennheiser IE300 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Sennheiser IE300 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Sennheiser IE300 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Sennheiser IE300 vs. Ziigaat Horizon
Ziigaat Horizon offers better treble, bass and mids.
7.9
Sennheiser IE300 vs. Nice HCK Himalaya
Nice HCK Himalaya offers better mids, bass and treble.
7.8
Sennheiser IE300 vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better bass, mids and treble.
7.8
Sennheiser IE300 vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better mids, bass and treble.
7.7
Sennheiser IE300 vs. Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua
Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua offers better bass, treble and mids.
7.7
Sennheiser IE300 vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better bass.
7.7
Sennheiser IE300 vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better bass, mids and treble.
7.6
Sennheiser IE300 vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Punch Audio Martilo offers better bass.
7.6
Sennheiser IE300 vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Xenns Tea Pro offers better bass, treble and mids.
7.5
Sennheiser IE300 vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better bass, mids and treble.
7.5
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Bass A-
The bass hits with conviction, offering both punch and clarity. It reaches low with confidence and control.
Mids A-
The mids sound lush and articulate, capturing emotion effortlessly. Strings and keys shimmer with realism.
Treble A-
The treble is exquisitely tuned, combining crystal detail with relaxed delivery. Micro-details emerge effortlessly.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer