Shuoer Tape Pro [2.4/10]

Reviews (3), scores and comparisons for Shuoer Tape Pro

IEMRanking.com Home Shuoer Tape Pro
My Ranking My Favorites

Average Reviewer Scores

Nymz
Precogvision
Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

2.4

Very Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

2.7

Gaming Grade

D-

Shuoer Tape Pro Details

Driver Configuration: 1DD

Tuning Type: V-Shaped

Price (Msrp): $130

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 4 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
C+ Tech
An attempt to fix the original Tapes by targeting not the upper mids, but the treble. Just makes things worse.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 2.1 Reviewer Score
E Tuning
D- Tech
"I tried the most dynamic songs, and nothing. The Tape Pro taped everything shut. Sorry. Move on." - Antdroid

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D Mids: E- Treble: E- Dynamics: D Details: E+ Imaging: D

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 1 Reviewer Score
E- Tuning
E- Tech
I'd rather listen to my own thoughts. Or a KZ.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: E- Mids: E- Treble: E- Details: E- Imaging: E-

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Shuoer Tape Pro Infos

Compare Shuoer Tape Pro to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Shuoer Tape Pro vs. Aful Explorer
Aful Explorer offers better treble, mids and details.
Show Aful Explorer
 7.1
Shuoer Tape Pro vs. Tanchjim Fission
Tanchjim Fission offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
Show Tanchjim Fission
 7
Shuoer Tape Pro vs. Dunu Kima 2
Dunu Kima 2 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
Show Dunu Kima 2
 7
Shuoer Tape Pro vs. Kiwi Ears Airoso
Kiwi Ears Airoso offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
Show Kiwi Ears Airoso
 6.9
Shuoer Tape Pro vs. Truthear Nova
Truthear Nova offers better mids, details and treble.
Show Truthear Nova
 6.7
Shuoer Tape Pro vs. Kefine Quatio
Kefine Quatio offers better bass, mids and treble.
Show Kefine Quatio
 6.7
Shuoer Tape Pro vs. Kiwi Ears ETUDE
Kiwi Ears ETUDE offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
Show Kiwi Ears ETUDE
 6.6
Shuoer Tape Pro vs. Shozy P20
Shozy P20 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
Show Shozy P20
 6.6
Shuoer Tape Pro vs. Padsmith IEM
Padsmith IEM offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
Show Padsmith IEM
 6.6
Shuoer Tape Pro vs. Simgot EM6L
Simgot EM6L offers better mids, treble and details.
Show Simgot EM6L
 6.5
Best IEMs from $100 - $200

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E+
  • Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.

Average Technical Grade

D-
  • Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Bass E+
Noticeably thin bass presence. Lacks body and texture, leaving low frequencies feeling hollow and underdeveloped.
Mids E-
Midrange is extremely recessed and muddy. Critical vocal frequencies are buried, making lyrics hard to discern.
Treble E-
Treble is extremely rolled off and veiled. High frequencies are barely perceptible with significant loss of detail.
Dynamics D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details E
Extremely poor resolution. Fine details are completely lost, leaving only a vague impression of the music's structure.
Imaging E+
Poor instrument placement with unstable positioning. Instruments drift and lack fixed locations within the sound field.
Gaming D-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer