Shure se215 [3.3/10]

Reviews (4), scores and comparisons for Shure se215

IEMRanking.com Home Shure se215
My Ranking My Favorites

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Shuwa-T Crin
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

3.3

Very Poor

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3

Gaming Grade

D

Shure se215 Details

Driver Configuration: 1DD

Tuning Type: Warm V

Brand: Shure Top Shure IEMs

Price (Msrp): $100

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Super* Review

Super* Review 4* * score normalized
check links for more info:

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel - Super* Review

Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 3.6 Reviewer Score
D- Tuning
C Tech
Comment: Already more than a decade old, it's time to move on. Would rather listen to the default samsung wired earpiece than this. Just no Literally everything apart from the subpar imaging

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: D Mids: E+ Treble: D Soundstage: C Details: C Imaging: C

Crin

Crin 3.5 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
D+ Tech
Sounds like a typical dynamic IEM. Slightly bloated bass and narrow staging.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel - Crin

Precogvision

Precogvision 1.9 Reviewer Score
D- Tuning
E- Tech
A relic of the past that should be avoided by any self-respecting audiophile who wants good sound.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel - Precogvision
Bass: D Mids: D Treble: E+ Dynamics: E- Details: E- Imaging: E-

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Shure se215 Infos

Compare Shure se215 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Shure se215 vs. Aful Explorer
Aful Explorer offers better dynamics, treble and details.
Show Aful Explorer
 7.1
Shure se215 vs. Dunu Kima 2
Dunu Kima 2 offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
Show Dunu Kima 2
 7
Shure se215 vs. Kiwi Ears ETUDE
Kiwi Ears ETUDE offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
Show Kiwi Ears ETUDE
 6.6
Shure se215 vs. JUZEAR x Z Reviews Defiant
JUZEAR x Z Reviews Defiant offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
Show JUZEAR x Z Reviews Defiant
 6.6
Shure se215 vs. Padsmith IEM
Padsmith IEM offers better dynamics, mids and soundstage.
Show Padsmith IEM
 6.6
Shure se215 vs. Simgot EM6L
Simgot EM6L offers better bass, details and imaging.
Show Simgot EM6L
 6.5
Shure se215 vs. Letshuoer S08
Letshuoer S08 offers better dynamics, treble and details.
Show Letshuoer S08
 6.5
Shure se215 vs. Kiwi Ears CANTA
Kiwi Ears CANTA offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
Show Kiwi Ears CANTA
 6.5
Shure se215 vs. Simgot EA500LM
Simgot EA500LM offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
Show Simgot EA500LM
 6.3
Shure se215 vs. Kefine Klanar
Kefine Klanar offers better bass, treble and mids.
Show Kefine Klanar
 6.3
Best IEMs from $50 - $100

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids D-
Midrange is thin and hollow with noticeable gaps. Instruments lack body and vocals sound distant and weak.
Treble D-
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics E-
Extremely poor dynamic expression. Lacks any sense of impact or volume gradation, making music feel one-dimensional.
Soundstage C
Average soundstage - adequate width but flat presentation. Reasonable instrument separation but lacks layering and depth.
Details D-
Noticeably blurred and lacking definition. Background elements are smeared together and micro-details are inaudible.
Imaging D-
Poor instrument placement with unstable positioning. Instruments drift and lack fixed locations within the sound field.
Gaming D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer