Simgot ET 142 - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (A Tier | 7.3/10)

Home Simgot ET 142

Summary

Based on 1 review, the Simgot ET 142 is standing out as a favorite among reviewers, who note that it elevates everyday playlists.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.3

Generally Favorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.1

Gaming Grade

B

Reviews

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.3 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B Tech
This is for the black nozzle ranking.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: B Soundstage: A-

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Simgot ET 142 Infos

Discuss Simgot ET 142 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Simgot ET 142 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Simgot ET 142 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Simgot ET 142 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Simgot ET 142 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.7
Simgot ET 142 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.7
Simgot ET 142 vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
7.5
Simgot ET 142 vs. Simgot ET142
Similar overall performance.
7.4
Simgot ET 142 vs. Letshuoer Cadenza 4
Letshuoer Cadenza 4 offers better mids and treble.
7.4
Simgot ET 142 vs. ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews
ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews offers better dynamics.
7.4
Simgot ET 142 vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics.
7.4
Simgot ET 142 vs. Crinear Meta
Crinear Meta offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.3
Simgot ET 142 vs. Hidizs MP145
Hidizs MP145 offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
7.3
Simgot ET 142 vs. TWISTURA WoodNote
TWISTURA WoodNote offers better mids.
7.3
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Mids B
It offers engaging mid frequencies with pleasing clarity and layering. Details emerge without becoming harsh.
Treble B
The top end is engaging and airy, yet never overbearing. Brass and strings feel energetic.
Dynamics B
You get confident dynamics that track both macro swings and rhythmic drive. There's life in every crescendo.
Soundstage A-
Immersion steps up dramatically as width, depth, and height integrate into a cohesive hologram. Everything sounds naturally spaced.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer