IEMRanking.com
Home
Simgot ET 142
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
7.3Generally Favorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.1Gaming Grade
BSimgot ET 142 Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: Simgot Top Simgot IEMs
Price (Msrp): $220
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
This is for the black nozzle ranking.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B
Treble: B
Dynamics: B
Soundstage: A-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Simgot ET 142 Infos
Compare Simgot ET 142 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
Simgot ET 142 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.7 |
Simgot ET 142 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
Simgot ET 142 vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.6 |
Simgot ET 142 vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics.
|
7.4 |
Simgot ET 142 vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.3 |
Simgot ET 142 vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better dynamics, soundstage and treble.
|
7.3 |
Simgot ET 142 vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better mids.
|
7.2 |
Simgot ET 142 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey 2
Ziigaat Odyssey 2 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.1 |
Simgot ET 142 vs. ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews
ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews offers better dynamics.
|
7.1 |
Simgot ET 142 vs. Letshuoer Cadenza 4
Letshuoer Cadenza 4 offers better mids and treble.
|
7.1 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids
B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble
B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics
B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage
A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming
B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review