Skorea Taaffete - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (D Tier | 3.4/10)

Home Skorea Taaffete

Summary

Based on 1 review, the Skorea Taaffete is serviceable yet underwhelming to reviewers, making it easy to overlook.

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision

Average Reviewer Score:

3.4

Very Poor

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.8

Gaming Grade

D+

Skorea Taaffete Details

Driver Configuration: n/a

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): n/a

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3.4 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
C- Tech
Absolutely scuffed sounding, needs a major retune. Very bloated and textures bass, roller coaster midrange, and pesky treble.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: D Treble: D Dynamics: C- Details: D Imaging: C+

Skorea Taaffete Infos

Discuss Skorea Taaffete with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Skorea Taaffete discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D
  • The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Textural information blurs together, making the stage feel pinched and gray. Instrument edges blur together frequently.
Bass C-
Low-end presence is gentle and restrained, favoring balance over slam. There's enough presence for casual listening.
Mids D
Expect a rollercoaster midrange where coloration constantly distracts. Complex vocals turn metallic and unnatural.
Treble D
Treble balance wavers, creating a mix of recessed detail and harsh flashes. Highs feel restless and unfocused.
Dynamics C-
Expect modest dynamics that keep music listenable without thrill. Micro-contrast is serviceable.
Details D
The overall picture is serviceable yet stripped of the tiny flourishes that add realism. Layering lacks consistent clarity.
Imaging C+
A stable phantom center appears, lending vocals a consistent anchor. It maintains a coherent phantom center.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer