Softears Cerberus - Reviews & Ratings

7 Reviews (A Tier | 7.2/10)

Home Softears Cerberus

Summary

Based on 7 reviews, the Softears Cerberus is earning strong approval from most reviewers, who appreciate its engaging character.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.2

Generally Favorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.5

Gaming Grade

B-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Kois Archive

Kois Archive 8.6 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S Tech
Rating: S | Value: ⭐ | Gaming: 🎮🎮 | Comfort: 9 best chill relaxed set. godlike soundstage dark treble presentation. could be boring.
Youtube Video Summary

Softears Cerberus hits that rare mix of mellow, relaxed listening with just enough fun to avoid boredom. The 1DD+4BA+2EST array keeps the bass mostly neutral with a tasteful sub-bass lift; it arrives when called, disappears when not, and shows off excellent texture with deep reach—easily one of the better dynamic drivers for low end in a tribrid. Mids stay true-to-tone and unforced; a touch of missing lower/mid-treble “focal” energy keeps vocals from getting shouty, trading bite for a soft, laid-back presence that matches the whole vibe.

The treble is the headline. It’s a dark, smooth take that still sprinkles in the right sparkle and extension from the ESTs—far better than the graph suggests—and it’s tailor-made for the treble-sensitive who still want real performance. Raw technicalities aren’t chasing summit-fi trophies (think competent hybrid/tribrid levels in the $500–$1,000 crowd), but the soundstage stretches impressively wide, among the widest heard on an IEM at home. That choice fits: a set tuned to relax shouldn’t turn analytical or clinical.

Recommended for listeners who want to chill, unwind, and enjoy a refined, non-fatiguing top end; not for those seeking maximum detail shove and fireworks—there are brighter, more forward options for that. As a high-end “kick back” piece, Cerberus stands out as a kilobuck set that invites getting lost in the music rather than dissecting it, and that’s exactly its charm.


Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Yifang

Yifang 8.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A+ Tech
One of the most tonally neutral, argubly the most reference & "correct" sounding to exist. Competent technicalities. Doesn't necessarily round super engaging or fun. Bass and extension is lacking in quantity. Technicalities fall short compared to certain competition in the modern market.

Yifang original ranking

Yifang Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 6.9 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B+ Tech
check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A Mids: A- Treble: B+ Soundstage: B+ Details: A- Imaging: A-

Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 6.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A- Tech

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 6 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B+ Tech
Lacking definition in the treble, otherwise a decently balanced tribrid IEM.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 4.8 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C Tech
Dissapointing lack of treble extension and very weak bass (literally sounds more BA than it does DD).

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: B Treble: C- Dynamics: C- Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.8 * score rescaled + normalized
3 community members have rated the SoftEars CERBERUS at an average of 4.7/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Exceptional.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Softears Cerberus Infos

Discuss Softears Cerberus with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Softears Cerberus discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Softears Cerberus to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Softears Cerberus vs. Fort Ears Mefisto
Fort Ears Mefisto offers better dynamics, treble and details.
9
Softears Cerberus vs. Thieaudio Valhalla
Thieaudio Valhalla offers better dynamics, imaging and bass.
8.9
Softears Cerberus vs. Elysian Apostle
Elysian Apostle offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
8.8
Softears Cerberus vs. Fiio FX17
Fiio FX17 offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
8.8
Softears Cerberus vs. AFUL Dawn-X
AFUL Dawn-X offers better treble, dynamics and bass.
8.7
Softears Cerberus vs. Dunu Glacier
Dunu Glacier offers better dynamics, soundstage and bass.
8.7
Softears Cerberus vs. Lime Ears Incognita
Lime Ears Incognita offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
8.5
Softears Cerberus vs. 64 Audio Tia Trio
64 Audio Tia Trio offers better dynamics, bass and imaging.
8.5
Softears Cerberus vs. BGVP Solomon
BGVP Solomon offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
8.5
Softears Cerberus vs. Symphonium Crimson
Symphonium Crimson offers better dynamics, bass and imaging.
8.4
Best IEMs from $2,000 - $4,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Expect an inviting tonal blend that adapts well to genres while staying largely composed. It strikes a nice blend of warmth and clarity.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • A competent technical showing keeps separation intact while delivering modest staging. It feels tidy even when recordings stack layers.
Bass B-
It delivers adequate punch and texture, though nothing stands out. Sub-bass presence is hinted rather than delivered.
Mids B+
The mids are articulate and well-balanced, lending body to instruments. Instrument layering remains stable.
Treble C+
Highs come through with reasonable clarity while staying mostly smooth. Sibilance is mostly controlled.
Dynamics C-
Dynamics are average—competent yet lacking real excitement. It keeps music listenable but uninspiring.
Soundstage B+
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.
Details B
You hear inner textures easily, even when the arrangement piles on layers. You can hear subtle studio effects.
Imaging B
Layered vocals and harmonies remain distinct and easy to track. Layered vocals remain easy to track.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer