Softears Cerberus [6.1/10]

Reviews (4), scores and comparisons for Softears Cerberus

IEMRanking.com Home Softears Cerberus
My Ranking My Favorites

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Shuwa-T Gizaudio Axel Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

6.1

Mixed to Positive

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.7

Gaming Grade

C

Softears Cerberus Details

Driver Configuration: 1DD+4BA+2EST

Tuning Type: Dark neutral

Brand: Softears Top Softears IEMs

Price (Msrp): $2,100

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 6.9 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B+ Tech
check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A Mids: A- Treble: B+ Soundstage: B+ Details: A- Imaging: A-

Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 6.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A- Tech
Darkish treble.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 6 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B+ Tech
Lacking definition in the treble, otherwise a decently balanced tribrid IEM.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 4.8 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C Tech
Dissapointing lack of treble extension and very weak bass (literally sounds more BA than it does DD).

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: B Treble: C- Dynamics: C- Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Softears Cerberus Infos

Compare Softears Cerberus to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Softears Cerberus vs. Thieaudio Valhalla
Thieaudio Valhalla offers better dynamics, imaging and bass.
Show Thieaudio Valhalla
 8.9
Softears Cerberus vs. Fiio FX17
Fiio FX17 offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
Show Fiio FX17
 8.9
Softears Cerberus vs. Elysian Apostle
Elysian Apostle offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
Show Elysian Apostle
 8.9
Softears Cerberus vs. Aful Dawn-X
Aful Dawn-X offers better treble, dynamics and bass.
Show Aful Dawn-X
 8.8
Softears Cerberus vs. Dunu Glacier
Dunu Glacier offers better dynamics, soundstage and bass.
Show Dunu Glacier
 8.7
Softears Cerberus vs. 64 Audio U12t
64 Audio U12t offers better dynamics, imaging and details.
Show 64 Audio U12t
 8.5
Softears Cerberus vs. 64 Audio Tia Trio
64 Audio Tia Trio offers better dynamics, bass and imaging.
Show 64 Audio Tia Trio
 8.5
Softears Cerberus vs. Symphonium x Elise Audio Europa
Symphonium x Elise Audio Europa offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
Show Symphonium x Elise Audio Europa
 8.5
Softears Cerberus vs. Symphonium Crimson
Symphonium Crimson offers better dynamics, bass and imaging.
Show Symphonium Crimson
 8.4
Softears Cerberus vs. 64 Audio Volur
64 Audio Volur offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
Show 64 Audio Volur
 8.4
Best IEMs from $2,000 - $4,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B-
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids B+
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Soundstage B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer