Softears Cerberus Review & Ranking

Aggregated Scores from Top Experts & Community

IEMRanking.com Home Softears Cerberus

Softears Cerberus Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Gizaudio Axel Crin Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

6.1

Mixed Reviews

Softears Cerberus Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.7

Gaming Grade

C

Review by:

Gizaudio Axel 6.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A- Tech

Review by:

Crin 6 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B+ Tech
Lacking definition in the treble, otherwise a decently balanced tribrid IEM.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel
- Crin

Review by:

Precogvision 4.8 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C Tech
Dissapointing lack of treble extension and very weak bass (literally sounds more BA than it does DD).

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: C- Mids: B Treble: C- Dynamics: C- Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Review by:

Shuwa-T 6.9 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B+ Tech
check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: A Mids: A- Treble: B+ Soundstage: B+ Details: A- Imaging: A-

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Flawed execution of tonal character. Noticeable peaks/dips affect timbre and coherence. May suit specific genres but lacks refinement.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Competent but unremarkable. Decent detail retrieval in quieter tracks, though busy sections challenge cohesion. Imaging is average, lacking depth.
Bass B-
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids B+
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Soundstage B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Top alternatives for Softears Cerberus

IEM Price Score
Thieaudio Valhalla $2,000 8.9
Elysian Apostle $1,799 8.9
Dunu Glacier $1,349.99 8.7
Symphonium x Elise Audio Europa $1,550 8.6
Symphonium Crimson $1,500 8.4
Canpur CP74E $2,900 8.4
64 Audio Volur $2,499 8.4
64 Audio U12t $2,000 8.4
64 Audio Tia Trio $2,300 8.4
Linsoul x HBB Jupiter $1,599 8.3
Best IEMs from $2,000 - $4,000
Write own User-Review for Softears Cerberus
Please to write User Reviews
Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Be the first to share your experience!