SoftEars Studio 2 Review & Ranking
Aggregated Scores from Top Experts & Community
IEMRanking.com
Home
SoftEars Studio 2
SoftEars Studio 2 Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.4Negative
SoftEars Studio 2 Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.9Gaming Grade
CSoftEars Studio 2 Details
Driver Configuration: 2BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $170
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Review by: Jays Audio
6
Reviewer Score
A-
Tuning
B+
Tech
HIGH VOLUME SET (at least 75dbs+). Warm, comfy, vintage-like sound with great immersion. Vocals are somehow still clear at higher volume and not overly dark. Not very good tech to $$ value wise, but very unique sounding. Would not recommend for mid to lower volume listening as it'll sound too dark, congested, and "low-res". Needs scaling. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Review by: Jaytiss
4
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
C+
Tech
Review by: Precogvision
3.2
Reviewer Score
D
Tuning
D
Tech
Plasticky and lo-res. Upper-midrange sounds scooped out which contributes to large imaging but nothing else commendable about this. Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D
Mids: D
Treble: C-
Dynamics: D
Details: D
Imaging: C-
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids
D-
Midrange is thin and hollow with noticeable gaps. Instruments lack body and vocals sound distant and weak.
Treble
C
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics
D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Soundstage
B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details
D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging
C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming
C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.
Top alternatives for SoftEars Studio 2
| IEM | Price | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Gizaudio x Binary Chopin | $199 | 7.6 |
| CrinEar Daybreak | $169.99 | 7.4 |
| EPZ P50 | $189 | 7 |
| Pula PA02 | $170 | 7 |
| Kiwi Ears KE4 | $199 | 6.9 |
| Kiwi Ears Aether | $170 | 6.8 |
| Etymotic ER4XR | $200 | 6.8 |
| Truthear Nova | $150 | 6.7 |
| AFUL MagicOne | $140 | 6.7 |
| Moondrop Kadenz | $190 | 6.6 |
Write own User-Review for SoftEars Studio 2
Please sign in with google to write User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Be the first to share your experience!