SoftEars Studio 2 [4.4/10]
Reviews (3), scores and comparisons for SoftEars Studio 2
IEMRanking.com
Home
SoftEars Studio 2
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.4Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.9Gaming Grade
CSoftEars Studio 2 Details
Driver Configuration: 2BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: Softears Top Softears IEMs
Price (Msrp): $170
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jays Audio
6
Reviewer Score
A-
Tuning
B+
Tech
HIGH VOLUME SET (at least 75dbs+). Warm, comfy, vintage-like sound with great immersion. Vocals are somehow still clear at higher volume and not overly dark. Not very good tech to $$ value wise, but very unique sounding. Would not recommend for mid to lower volume listening as it'll sound too dark, congested, and "low-res". Needs scaling.
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
4
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
C+
Tech
Reviewed by: Precogvision
3.2
Reviewer Score
D
Tuning
D
Tech
Plasticky and lo-res. Upper-midrange sounds scooped out which contributes to large imaging but nothing else commendable about this.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D
Mids: D
Treble: C-
Dynamics: D
Details: D
Imaging: C-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
SoftEars Studio 2 Infos
Compare SoftEars Studio 2 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
SoftEars Studio 2 vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better bass, details and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
SoftEars Studio 2 vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better mids, details and bass.
|
7.3 |
|
SoftEars Studio 2 vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better bass, dynamics and details.
|
7.3 |
|
SoftEars Studio 2 vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better mids, bass and treble.
|
7 |
|
SoftEars Studio 2 vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better mids, bass and treble.
|
7 |
|
SoftEars Studio 2 vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better mids, bass and dynamics.
|
6.9 |
|
SoftEars Studio 2 vs. TWISTURA WoodNote
TWISTURA WoodNote offers better mids, soundstage and dynamics.
|
6.9 |
|
SoftEars Studio 2 vs. Kiwi Ears Aether
Kiwi Ears Aether offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
6.8 |
|
SoftEars Studio 2 vs. Ziigaat Lush
Ziigaat Lush offers better mids, bass and dynamics.
|
6.8 |
|
SoftEars Studio 2 vs. ZIIGAAT x HBB Arcadia
ZIIGAAT x HBB Arcadia offers better bass, mids and dynamics.
|
6.7 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids
D-
Midrange is thin and hollow with noticeable gaps. Instruments lack body and vocals sound distant and weak.
Treble
C
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics
D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Soundstage
C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details
D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging
C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming
C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review