Softears Studio 4 [7.4/10]
Reviews (6), scores and comparisons for Softears Studio 4
IEMRanking.com
Home
Softears Studio 4
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
7.4Generally Favorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
7Gaming Grade
A-Softears Studio 4 Details
Driver Configuration: 4BA
Tuning Type: Neutral
Brand: Softears Top Softears IEMs
Price (Msrp): $450
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
8*
* score normalized
8
Reviewer Score
A+
Tuning
A+
Tech
Just great all around, balance with amazingly clean midrange Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+
Mids: S
Treble: S
8
Reviewer Score
A-
Tuning
A-
Tech
Something magical about this set, but it's not the Bass. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: A+
Treble: A-
Dynamics: C+
Soundstage: A+
8
Reviewer Score
S
Tuning
A
Tech
A benchmark for tonality and timbre. Neutral, accurate sound with great bass, tonal accuracy, forward vocals, and natural timbre. Excellent isolation. Unvented design and BA bass may not suit everyone.Gizaudio Axel original ranking
Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
7.5
Reviewer Score
S-
Tuning
A+
Tech
Best all rounder under $500. "Correct" and neutral tuning. Perfect vocals, not as forward like RSV but zero faults. Slight Improvement over RSV in-terms of seapration and stage size/treble is same/not as warm. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
5
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C+
Tech
Sounds plasticky and smoothed; inoffensive to the point of being offensive. Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Dynamics: C+
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Softears Studio 4 Infos
Compare Softears Studio 4 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Softears Studio 4 vs. NiceHCK Rockies
Offers better details, imaging and dynamics.
|
8.1 |
|
Softears Studio 4 vs. Xenns Top Pro
Offers better details, imaging and dynamics.
|
7.9 |
|
Softears Studio 4 vs. ZiiGaat Luna
Offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
7.9 |
|
Softears Studio 4 vs. Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk
Offers better details, imaging and bass.
|
7.7 |
|
Softears Studio 4 vs. HiSenior Cano Cristales
Offers better dynamics.
|
7.5 |
|
Softears Studio 4 vs. Ziigaat Arcanis
Offers better dynamics and mids.
|
7.5 |
|
Softears Studio 4 vs. Yanyin Canon II
Similar overall performance.
|
7.5 |
|
Softears Studio 4 vs. Kiwi Ears x HBB Punch
Offers better dynamics and bass.
|
7.4 |
|
Softears Studio 4 vs. Dunu DK-3001 BD
Offers better details, dynamics and imaging.
|
7.4 |
|
Softears Studio 4 vs. Thieaudio Hype 4
Offers better details, imaging and dynamics.
|
7.4 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.
Average Technical Grade
A-- Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Bass
B+
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids
A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble
A-
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics
C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage
A+
Exceptional soundstage with holographic imaging. Creates a truly three-dimensional space where instruments float naturally around you.
Details
C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review