Softears Volume Review & Ranking

Aggregated Scores from Top Experts & Community

IEMRanking.com Home Softears Volume

Softears Volume Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision Nymz
Tim Tuned
Gizaudio Axel Crin Super* Review Shuwa-T Z-Reviews
Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

5.9

Generally Unfavorable

Softears Volume Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.2

Gaming Grade

B

Review by:

Gizaudio Axel 6.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A- Tech
check links for more info:

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
- Gizaudio Axel

Review by:

Crin 6.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
B Tech
check links for more info:

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel
- Crin

Review by:

Jaytiss 7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A+ Tech
Smooth, slightly splashy treble, but a legend.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: A- Treble: A+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: A-

Review by:

Precogvision 4.9 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C Tech
Decent tonality but boring dynamics and low-level detailing. Oddly dipped in the mid-treble.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C- Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Review by:

Tim Tuned 5.5 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
A- Tech
Pros: Nicely tuned, vocal forward signature. Cons: Treble air.

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
- Tim Tuned
Bass: A- Mids: A+ Treble: A-

Review by:

Super* Review 6* * score normalized

Review by:

Shuwa-T 6.3 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B+ Tech
check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: B+ Mids: B- Treble: B+ Soundstage: B Details: A- Imaging: B+

Review by:

Nymz 4.1 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
C Tech
Amp, tip, fit dependent. Pinna gain of death. Technicalities are good, but it's too bright for some, including me. Good for people that listen at VERY low levels and love some bite. Bass lacks intangible aspects.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

- Nymz
Bass: C- Mids: D Treble: C- Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Review by:

Z-Reviews 6 * score normalized

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Flawed execution of tonal character. Noticeable peaks/dips affect timbre and coherence. May suit specific genres but lacks refinement.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Competent but unremarkable. Decent detail retrieval in quieter tracks, though busy sections challenge cohesion. Imaging is average, lacking depth.
Bass B-
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids B-
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details B-
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging B-
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Top alternatives for Softears Volume

Write own User-Review for Softears Volume
Please to write User Reviews
Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Be the first to share your experience!