Softears Volume [5.9/10]
Reviews (9), scores and comparisons for Softears Volume
IEMRanking.com
Home
Softears Volume
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.9Mixed
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6Gaming Grade
BSoftears Volume Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+2BA
Tuning Type: Bright neutral
Brand: Softears Top Softears IEMs
Price (Msrp): $285
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
7
Reviewer Score
B
Tuning
A-
Tech
Smooth, slightly splashy treble, but a legend.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B
Treble: A-
Dynamics: C+
Soundstage: B
Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel
6.5
Reviewer Score
B+
Tuning
A-
Tech
Reviewed by: Crin
6.5
Reviewer Score
A+
Tuning
B
Tech
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
6.3
Reviewer Score
B
Tuning
B+
Tech
check links for more info:
Bass: B+
Mids: B-
Treble: B+
Soundstage: B
Details: A-
Imaging: B+
Reviewed by: Z-Reviews
6
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Super* Review
6*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Tim Tuned
5.5
Reviewer Score
B-
Tuning
A-
Tech
Nicely tuned, vocal forward signature
Treble air
Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A-
Mids: A+
Treble: A-
Reviewed by: Precogvision
4.9
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C
Tech
Decent tonality but boring dynamics and low-level detailing. Oddly dipped in the mid-treble.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Dynamics: C-
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Reviewed by: Nymz
4.1
Reviewer Score
D+
Tuning
C
Tech
Amp, tip, fit dependent. Pinna gain of death. Technicalities are good, but it's too bright for some, including me. Good for people that listen at VERY low levels and love some bite. Bass lacks intangible aspects.
Bass: C-
Mids: D
Treble: C-
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Softears Volume Infos
Compare Softears Volume to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Softears Volume vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better bass, mids and soundstage.
|
7.7 |
|
Softears Volume vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better dynamics, mids and imaging.
|
7.7 |
|
Softears Volume vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better imaging, dynamics and details.
|
7.6 |
|
Softears Volume vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, dynamics and bass.
|
7.6 |
|
Softears Volume vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
|
7.5 |
|
Softears Volume vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Punch Audio Martilo offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
|
7.5 |
|
Softears Volume vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better bass, imaging and mids.
|
7.4 |
|
Softears Volume vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics, soundstage and mids.
|
7.4 |
|
Softears Volume vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.3 |
|
Softears Volume vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Kiwi Ears Septet offers better dynamics and soundstage.
|
7.3 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B-- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
B-
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
B-
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
C
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Soundstage
B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details
B-
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
B-
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review