Sony MDR-EX15 - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (D Tier | 3.3/10)

Home Sony MDR-EX15

Summary

Based on 1 review, the Sony MDR-EX15 is getting lukewarm responses from reviewers, who note that it performs best with tempered expectations.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

3.3

Very Poor

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.4

Gaming Grade

D

Reviews

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3.3 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
D Tech
Surprisingly well extended in the treble if not a little strident and forward in the lower-treble.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D Mids: C- Treble: C- Dynamics: D Details: C- Imaging: D

Sony MDR-EX15 Infos

Discuss Sony MDR-EX15 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Sony MDR-EX15 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Sony MDR-EX15 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Sony MDR-EX15 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Sony MDR-EX15 vs. KZ EDC PRO
KZ EDC PRO offers better bass, dynamics and details.
5.4
Sony MDR-EX15 vs. QKZ ZXN
Similar overall performance.
5.3
Sony MDR-EX15 vs. QKZ AK6
Similar overall performance.
5
Sony MDR-EX15 vs. Tripowin Piccolo
Tripowin Piccolo offers better bass.
4.2
Sony MDR-EX15 vs. JVC FX7 Gumy
Similar overall performance.
3.1
Sony MDR-EX15 vs. HiFiMAN Bolt
Similar overall performance.
2
Best IEMs from below $50

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.
Bass D
It hints at bass presence but never quite delivers satisfying punch. Percussion lacks a satisfying weight.
Mids C-
It delivers a workable midrange that could benefit from smoother transitions. Timbre isn't quite convincing yet.
Treble C-
Expect serviceable treble that keeps detail audible without much polish. It keeps the highs audible without elegance.
Dynamics D
Dynamics sound noticeably compressed, muting contrast between quiet and loud. Transients feel blunted and slow.
Details C-
The presentation is fine for casual listening but leaves refinement on the table. There's some grain on quieter elements.
Imaging D
Stereo cues appear but wobble, leaving the panorama feeling imprecise. Center image lacks solidity.
Gaming D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer