Soranik SP3 - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (C Tier | 5/10)

IEMRanking.com Home Soranik SP3

Average Reviewer Scores

Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

5

Mixed to Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.7

Gaming Grade

B-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
Thin-sounding, a little strong with the BA timbre and can be fatiguing.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Soranik SP3 Infos

Compare Soranik SP3 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Soranik SP3 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Similar overall performance.
7.7
Soranik SP3 vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Similar overall performance.
7.6
Soranik SP3 vs. Epz K9
Similar overall performance.
7.6
Soranik SP3 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Similar overall performance.
7.6
Soranik SP3 vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
Similar overall performance.
7.5
Soranik SP3 vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Similar overall performance.
7.4
Soranik SP3 vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Similar overall performance.
7.4
Soranik SP3 vs. CrinEar Meta
Similar overall performance.
7.3
Soranik SP3 vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Similar overall performance.
7.3
Soranik SP3 vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
Similar overall performance.
7.2
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer