SymphonyEars Hexad - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (B Tier | 6/10)

Home SymphonyEars Hexad

Summary

Based on 1 review, the SymphonyEars Hexad is earning a favorable overall impression from reviewers thanks to its consistent performance.

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

6

Mixed to Positive

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 6 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
It's a nice sound, worth the price to support local talent.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: B

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

SymphonyEars Hexad Infos

Discuss SymphonyEars Hexad with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "SymphonyEars Hexad discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare SymphonyEars Hexad to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough SymphonyEars Hexad reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
SymphonyEars Hexad vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
7.7
SymphonyEars Hexad vs. Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua
Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
7.7
SymphonyEars Hexad vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.7
SymphonyEars Hexad vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
7.7
SymphonyEars Hexad vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
7.7
SymphonyEars Hexad vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.7
SymphonyEars Hexad vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
7.5
SymphonyEars Hexad vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
7.5
SymphonyEars Hexad vs. INTUAURA Balance
INTUAURA Balance offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.4
SymphonyEars Hexad vs. Simgot ET142
Similar overall performance.
7.4
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble C+
Treble feels agreeable overall, bringing sparkle without significant fatigue. You get a polite sense of air.
Dynamics C+
Dynamics feel competent, bringing energy without the finest detail. It carries energy without sounding aggressive.
Soundstage B
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer