Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.6Mixed
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.5Gaming Grade
CTanchjim Hana Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: Bright V
Brand: TANCHJIM Top TANCHJIM IEMs
Price (Msrp): $160
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
Reviewed by: Crin
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
Treble just not good, too much upper mids as energy.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+
Treble: D
Dynamics: D
Soundstage: B
Reviewed by: Precogvision
Singers sound like they're choking.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+
Mids: C-
Treble: C-
Dynamics: C+
Details: C-
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Tanchjim Hana Infos
Compare Tanchjim Hana to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
Tanchjim Hana vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better details, dynamics and mids.
|
7.3 |
Tanchjim Hana vs. Tanchjim Fission
Tanchjim Fission offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
|
7 |
Tanchjim Hana vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
7 |
Tanchjim Hana vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
7 |
Tanchjim Hana vs. TWISTURA WoodNote
TWISTURA WoodNote offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
6.9 |
Tanchjim Hana vs. Kiwi Ears Airoso
Kiwi Ears Airoso offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
6.9 |
Tanchjim Hana vs. Kiwi Ears Aether
Kiwi Ears Aether offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
6.8 |
Tanchjim Hana vs. Ziigaat Lush
Ziigaat Lush offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
6.8 |
Tanchjim Hana vs. Truthear Nova
Truthear Nova offers better details, treble and dynamics.
|
6.7 |
Tanchjim Hana vs. Kefine Quatio
Kefine Quatio offers better dynamics, treble and bass.
|
6.7 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C-- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
C
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble
D+
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics
C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Soundstage
B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details
C-
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review