Tanchjim Hana 2021 [6.2/10]
Reviews (8), scores and comparisons for Tanchjim Hana 2021
IEMRanking.com
Home
Tanchjim Hana 2021
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.2Mixed to Positive
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.9Gaming Grade
B-Tanchjim Hana 2021 Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: V-shape
Brand: TANCHJIM Top TANCHJIM IEMs
Price (Msrp): $180
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
8.5*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Bad Guy Good Audio
7.1
Reviewer Score
A-
Tuning
B
Tech
Great bass (accurate) mids. One of the best 1/DD sets
Ghetto cable. Looks like girls jewelry
Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking
Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
Bass: A-
Mids: A-
Treble: B
Reviewed by: Audionotions
7
Reviewer Score
Best single DD in this price tier - a step down in imaging and separation from Origin but it is a more fun to listen to given the bass shelf. Better fit than Origin too but YMMV. Loaner
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
6.2
Reviewer Score
B
Tuning
B
Tech
Comment: Better tuned upper midrange compared to the original Hana.
Decent tonality, difficult to fault
Can be somewhat aggressive sounding at times
Bass: B
Mids: B
Treble: B+
Soundstage: B
Details: B+
Imaging: B
Reviewed by: Precogvision
5.9
Reviewer Score
B
Tuning
B-
Tech
Essentially a cheaper Tanchjim Oxygen.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B
Mids: B
Treble: B
Dynamics: B
Details: C+
Imaging: B
Reviewed by: Jays Audio
5.5
Reviewer Score
A-
Tuning
B+
Tech
An Oxygen with more bass and note-weight but at the cost of slightly worse imaging and detail.
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Tim Tuned
5
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
A-
Tech
Reviewed by: Nymz
4.3
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
C-
Tech
A warmer, bassier, slightly less technical and a bit more V-shaped Oxygen. Rec'd for those that love harman but want more bass quantity.
Bass: C+
Mids: C-
Treble: C-
Details: C-
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Tanchjim Hana 2021 Infos
Compare Tanchjim Hana 2021 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better details, imaging and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better details, imaging and mids.
|
7.3 |
|
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better details, bass and dynamics.
|
7.3 |
|
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better mids, bass and treble.
|
7 |
|
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better mids, soundstage and bass.
|
7 |
|
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better mids, soundstage and treble.
|
6.9 |
|
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. TWISTURA WoodNote
TWISTURA WoodNote offers better mids and soundstage.
|
6.9 |
|
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. Kiwi Ears Aether
Kiwi Ears Aether offers better treble and soundstage.
|
6.8 |
|
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. Ziigaat Lush
Ziigaat Lush offers better mids, soundstage and bass.
|
6.8 |
|
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. ZIIGAAT x HBB Arcadia
ZIIGAAT x HBB Arcadia offers better bass and mids.
|
6.7 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B-- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids
B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble
B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage
B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details
C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
B-
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review