Tanchjim Hana 2021 - Reviews & Ratings

9 Reviews (B Tier | 6.4/10)

Home Tanchjim Hana 2021

Summary

Based on 9 reviews, the Tanchjim Hana 2021 is earning a favorable overall impression from reviewers thanks to its consistent performance.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

6.4

Mixed to Positive

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.9

Gaming Grade

B-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 8.5* * score rescaled + normalized

Reviewed by: Bad Guy Good Audio

Bad Guy Good Audio 7.1 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B Tech
Great bass (accurate) mids. One of the best 1/DD sets Ghetto cable. Looks like girls jewelry

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: B

Reviewed by: Audionotions

Audionotions 7 Reviewer Score
Best single DD in this price tier - a step down in imaging and separation from Origin but it is a more fun to listen to given the bass shelf. Better fit than Origin too but YMMV.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 6.2 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B Tech
Comment: Better tuned upper midrange compared to the original Hana. Decent tonality, difficult to fault Can be somewhat aggressive sounding at times

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B Mids: B Treble: B+ Soundstage: B Details: B+ Imaging: B

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 5.9 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B- Tech
Essentially a cheaper Tanchjim Oxygen.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: B Details: C+ Imaging: B

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 5.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B+ Tech
An Oxygen with more bass and note-weight but at the cost of slightly worse imaging and detail.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
A- Tech
Cheaper Oxygen with small cut back in details

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: B

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 4.3 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
A warmer, bassier, slightly less technical and a bit more V-shaped Oxygen. Rec'd for those that love harman but want more bass quantity.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C+ Mids: C- Treble: C- Details: C- Imaging: C+

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.2 * score rescaled + normalized
3 community members have rated the Tanchjim Hana 2021 at an average of 4.4/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Tanchjim Hana 2021 Infos

Discuss Tanchjim Hana 2021 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Tanchjim Hana 2021 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Tanchjim Hana 2021 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. Letshuoer S12 Ultra
Letshuoer S12 Ultra offers better details, imaging and treble.
7.6
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better details, imaging and dynamics.
7.5
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. Hidizs MP145
Hidizs MP145 offers better details, dynamics and soundstage.
7.3
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. Crinear Daybreak
Crinear Daybreak offers better details, imaging and mids.
7.3
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. TWISTURA WoodNote
TWISTURA WoodNote offers better mids and soundstage.
7.3
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better details, imaging and mids.
7.2
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better details, bass and dynamics.
7.2
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. Kiwi Ears Aether
Kiwi Ears Aether offers better details, imaging and soundstage.
7.2
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better mids, soundstage and treble.
7.2
Tanchjim Hana 2021 vs. Hidizs mk12 x Ducbloke
Hidizs mk12 x Ducbloke offers better details, imaging and dynamics.
7.1
Best IEMs from $100 - $200

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Bass B
You get a lively bass response that balances energy with discipline. It balances punch with respectable control.
Mids B
Expect a confident midrange that keeps details audible without harshness. Acoustic arrangements sound engaging.
Treble B-
Expect a polite treble presentation that balances presence with restraint. Percussion carries a pleasant sparkle.
Dynamics B
Expect energetic dynamics that bring music to life without harshness. It injects enthusiasm into fast music.
Soundstage B
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.
Details C+
Ambient cues appear, albeit with softer focus than die-hard resolution seekers may prefer. You can follow supporting instruments well.
Imaging B-
Stereo cues lock in more reliably, even if depth mapping remains approximate. Panning transitions smoothly across the stage.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer